My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
Jay, I noticed the Luxmans went up for sale. I believe that a lead in to what the video may fortell 
3 and 1 close.
2 a distant 3rd place, veiled. 
3 seemed clearest but perhaps could get little fatiguing so I might pick 1 but would need to hear longer to see if 3 was a 2 minute wonder and still sounded good an hour iater
@mrdecibel, none taken! I learned something and look to hear it...I try to listen to everyone like I try to listen to music...
# 3 sounding the most real and captivating.
# 2 kind of holding some middle ground,
# 1 is certainly ultra detailed almost surreal but 'over-euphonic' if that is a/the word 😊. 

# 1 sound somehow too 'new', not all settled in maybe, but in total all are very exceptional sounding sets for sure. 

— What Watt/Puppies are those, if I may ask please? Version 7 ?
Sorry, I'm a bit behind the curve... 😏
😘 
Michélle 🇿🇦 
Hi WC, we emailed last year about my xp-30 and since I finally did sell my XP-30 and have moved to dac direct, I wholeheartedly agree with your comments regarding pre/no pre. A couple of quick questions about your last couple videos.....What are you now using for a source/streamer? And what connection method? What cable? By the way, based on your videos I auditioned Wireworld speaker cables and went with the silver eclipse 8 (affordable, great value). Probably try their interconnects next.  Thx for your insights and hard work. Much appreciated.

In descending order of preference for the three systems:

 

#3 -- Greatest harmonic complexity in guitar. Greatest clarity in enunciation of lyrics. Also the most emotionally involving... Seems to have more microdynamics than the other ones, and greatest sense of space.

 

#1 -- Nice harmonics and atmosphere, but lyrics are not quite as crisp as #3.

 

#2 -- Nice sense of the droning bass note, but overall I found that my attention was wandering... It sounded smooth, but not emotionally involving.

 

Saluti, Guido


Thanks for this Guido. Interesting thoughts. 
Lots and lots of it interesting comments on my YouTube channel as well. There's a feeling that people like number 3 and then number 1 with number 2 being last ? Not sure but that's what I gather from the comments. 
You are all in for a treat once I disclose what each component was :) 
If I were to bet, I’d bet that number three was the Vivaldi direct based on one of your comments that if you want great sound, buy a world class dac. Will be intresting to find out if that’s the case or not. I’m secretly hoping the ayre was the number three since I just purchased one, lol. 

#1 and #3 sounded very similar.

#2 sounded rounder, a little softer, less distinct.

Depending on the in-room experience (vs. the long chain via which we're hearing these samples), this could be a good thing or a bad thing.

For example, more distinct could become a little etched.  But not through AudioEngine computer speakers.

WC, you should borrow your dealer the all new Shunyata Reference Sigma NR V2 powercord and try it on the dcS Vivaldi. Nothing to loose. Maybe this is the one that could beat the Odin 2.

It is said to be a game changer as to the live feeling of music, to make everything sound more real.
I auditioned and purchased the Synergistic Research Power Cell SRX with their Galileo power cord yesterday. I read a review online that pitched this against the PSA product and a different brand that uses magnetics. I feel most people over state the differences they hear. I have been a sceptic about Expensive cords,and maybe I still am, only had time to listen to this one product. Once we switched a couple of time, I noticed a background hiss between notes, that was appear to because of its total absence with the power cell running. Obviously this his wasn’t huge since I had not noticed it before, but we were listening at fairly low levels compared to my normal, so it’s possible would have been more noticeable if louder. I also noticed a bit more impact and punch I. The highs and lows, and likely through the whole range if I had more time to listen. At the low volume levels, the fact that it was apparent got my interest. I did end up purchasing the unit, and I suppose I may be headed down the road of high end cables, interconnects etc, after I find time to audition those. Some sources, Audioholics is the main one I can think of, feel it’s all snake oil. Again, I was skeptical to say the least, and truly expected to not hear a difference as I did not many 15 years ago when I first started on the high end journey. I also just purchased the PSA P20 thinking that even if there was no sound improve the, I would have great surge protection and will experiment with that in line before and after the Power Cell at the outlet. I wonder if Jay has tried this product and how he felt it worked for him if so. 
I have tried the P20 from ps audio and after i tried the Shunyata Denali 6000T and Audioquest Niagara 5000 i realized the Ps Audio P20 is nothing else more than a great power surge protector. I believe my perception of "change" in sound was merely psychological which was confirmed once i used the power conditioners mentioned above. 
To me, the P20 is just a prettier chassis than the Furman 20i, but they both do about the same in regards to sound improvements. 
I DO NOT understand WHY manufacturers don't look at other companies to understand WHAT they do to succeed at certain things. For example, if i am a cable manufacturer and want to make better power cords, i would buy a nordost odin 1, Audioquest Dragon or Hurricane and dissect them and see what they did so i can get ideas on how to improve my own products. Listen, this is NO DIFFERENT than if you are trying to pass an exam and can't seem to pass it and you finally realize you need to pass so you need to find out what the hell your class mate did to pass it.
Where did he study? what book did he read? does he have material you can borrow so you can do better? At one point you gotta give up if you are not cutting it with a certain component. i actually have given this feedback to a few manufacturers but when you do that they feel offended or look at you with this face like you insulted them rather than seeing it as constructive criticism. Look i get it, you should aim for innovation, but if that is not happening then grab ideas (it does not mean you have to copy everything). Study the product from other manufacturers and see what the hell they do to remain successful. 

As smart as Paul Mcgowan is, i don't understand WHY he has not done this by now. However, you can lead the horse to the water, but you can't make him drink it. 
@techno....yes that cable will make an entrance here at some point. I almost bought it last week, but i need to have content for the future lol...
i actually have MANY who tell me i go through gear too fast and don't give it too much time to settle in, or that i need to have it for a few months, etc, etc. IF I held on to gear for months in order to give my thoughts we would be on page 20 of this thread and STILL working through Bryston amps....  just saying..
Power is different depending on where you live and your situation - you can't ascribe differences between filtering vs. regeneration vs. iso transformers without trying them in your own house.
If you are going to bring Shunyata V2 cables in, you should also give the latest conditioners a shot at some point.  I have the Denali 6000/s V2 and it made quite a difference in my system.  

Also, it's insanely expensive, but the Omega power cable is supposed to be mind-blowing on amps.  Since amps are your main focus..

Plus there is a new Everest conditioner coming soon.  Lots of toys.
whitecamaross - what you were discussing is called reverse engineering. That is - taking apart an existing product to determine how it was make - what materials were used, how it was constructed and whatever else is significant.
And while you’re doing that, might want to check to see if they have patents covering what you want to “borrow”
I agree jay. The problem is that I’m not sure they believe, or want to believe, that other product work better. I havnt yet heard the P20, and it seems you feel it did less than the review I read. The SR power cell did make an audible and noticeable difference, so that one I can attest to first hand. I know different people hear different things when it comes to some equipment, as your most recent video proves. While most agreed that number 3 was best, with only one person I saw who didn’t care for it, there was not a conscious on the other two. 
I thought that 1 sounded decent at the beginning, until the voice came in - very distant it seemed.  Then 2 was better on the voice - more presence, but didn't have as much otherwise.  I ended up liking 3 the best - the best balance for both instruments and voice.
Jay, you've said many times that the m-900u is the best bang for your buck.  You've pitted it against the heavy hitters. 

But I don't think you've ever dropped the price qualifier and given your opinion straight up against the big players. 

How would you characterize the differences?  What do you "give up" if you buy the luxman instead of the momentum stereo, for example? 


Wrapping things up here. Listened to the momentum set up for 3 hours , 47 min straight. Stay tuned, lots of feedback coming. 
Teasing us with new toys when you still havnt told us what the last ones were. 
The latest video with the Gryphon shows brilliant sound with all 3.  The brilliant recording with the guitar intro helps.  On my iMac, all three are surprisingly close, which accounts for different objective descriptions by different listeners.  My top choice is #1, for its greatest detail in the twang of the guitar.  The voice is a little raw, but I believe it is accurate, and the others (#2, #3) sugar coat the voice a little.  Maybe #2 has the most sugar.  I will stick my neck out and say #1 is the DCS direct without any preamp.  If I am wrong, then whichever preamp it is, let this preamp do a shootout with the DCS direct to see which setup is the most transparent.

If you are coming to value neutrality/clarity/transparency, then the Benchmark AHB2 with or without its LA4 preamp, is nearly the best on an absolute basis, and the best value.  Don't be prejudiced against it because it doesn't have audiophile pedigree and is so cheap that your dealer contacts sneer at it.  I am not an unquestioning Benchmark fanboy, since they deny that more expensive audiophile cables are better than their Canare pro cables.  I've used Canare.
viber6 - I agree about the detail in the twang of the guitar on #1, which I was also enjoying. Just not sure about the vocals though. I think it would be a matter of taste between #1 and #3. #2 seems to put the vocal forward at the expense of everything else.


Looking forward to WC’s reveal :-)
Jay, I believe you mentioned that you use the Vivaldi to stream with. I could be wrong. After ready up some I did not see that it had an app like naim or nad do to stream tidal, iTunes, etc while using their mobile device to control it. I’m sure you can hook up a roon( which I dropped after the trial period, just couldn’t figure it out, and didn’t have the patience to learn) or an NAS, though I don’t follow how those work either. I could have misunderstood what you said, but if it does, that would really be great, or I’ll have to use a naim streamer etc with it
Some experienced reviewer once commented that the major difference among top preamps is the upper midrange. Interesting that this quality can be heard in a YouTube video through computer speakers. On the other hand, the computer simulation does not relate qualities of the virtual soundstage - may need Jay to comment on that.

Guessing #1 is Ayre.


the zaks,
Usually or quite often, if HF are subdued, this gives more relative prominence to the voice, which is centered in the midrange.  We agree about #2 showing "the vocal forward at the expense of everything else."  Since the Ayre has more HF emphasis than the Lux, #2 is more likely to be the Lux, although we don't yet know the relative character of the Dag preamp.
I think i must have pissed some people off with my findings :)
Some of the comments are indeed correct, but extremist. For instance, cable footers, or a stand for each amplifier i own or a different power cord for each amp i own. Catch my drift?
Anyhow, i believe there might have been some "momentum" or "ayre" lovers that were butt-hurt after i selected the Luxman, but THAT IS WHAT I WILL DO. I will say what i hear in MY SPACE and if it ticks people off then either deal with it or don’t listen to my findings.
We can all agree that at some point we all need to hit the brakes with this hobby. We all need to draw the line somewhere and you HAVE NOOOO IDEA how many times i have been told " oh no i would never spend $5,000 dollars on a powercord Jay", but i am supposed to buy a stand for each amp i bring? :)
Some people take this to the extreme, but what they don’t quite realize is that they are trying to dial in THEIR single amplifier with the only preamp they have and the only set of speakers they have owned for the last 24 months. Of course it is easy to do it in that scenario, but how in the world AM I SUPPOSED to do the same with so much gear here?
Am i supposed to chase 10 sets of power cords for all the amps and then 10 speaker cables (i tried cardas, don’t get me started on that topic) and then buy a different stand for each amp i own ? So let’s say i did buy all of those different cables and stands, HOW IN THE WORLD can i sustain so many shootouts with so many cables, stands, xlr, etc, etc? when do i finish?
That is why it is important to keep things into perspective and as simple as possible. If a $10,000 stand is going to make an amplifier go from a C grade to an A in terms of sound then maybe i am in the wrong hobby and i should be buying $30,000 dollar racks and stands and cable lifters and just stick to $1500 dollar emotiva, parasound and Bob Carver amps ? (no offense)
Lastly, THIS IS ABOUT SYNERGY people. i have been saying this all along and RIGHT NOW the luxman and Gryphon sound extremely good. As a matter of fact, the Luxman 900u preamp sounds better with the Gryphon than the Gryphon did with the Gryphon Zena preamp!!
Let’s not forget that this entire situation might completely turn around once i do the FULL momentum set up here. Mix and matching is GAMBLING in many cases as you have seen on the video i posted, but it is still part of the fun.
I will probably have to put out a video addressing this above so people can understand where i am coming from. 
I am JUST GETTING STARTED with the momentum stuff. i have yet to try odin power cords, different xlr, plug it into the Niagara 5000, use the dac direct into the momentum s250, etc, etc. Soooo much more ahead of me. 
As good as the Luxman M900u amp is, I heard and also read its partner the C900u is an even better piece... Your last preamp shootout just prooved this. 😃

The Dag fanboys must be scratching their head right now.


Jay, thank you for answering my question in the video.

Now you are making me want either a second M900u, or a C900u to run the M900u I just bought (don't have yet).

Well, I still need to hear this stuff in my own system, and I can't afford to buy everything now anyway!
I am impressed that the Dag preamp was the most transparent and detailed with the Gryphon.  Since you have small reservations about the Dag, I think the most interesting shootout would be Dag + DCS + Gryphon (or Dag amp) vs DCS alone + Gryphon (or Dag amp).  Your preference for the Lux preamp means that you still like some flavoring, and you may not be quite as ready to accept the clarity and naturalness of bypassing any preamp.  My proposed shootout should help you resolve this issue.  Perhaps the Dag preamp has close to the purity of no preamp, and has the advantage of giving you extra dynamics so you could have total satisfaction at high SPL's as well as low-medium SPL's.  Use that wonderful recording of the guitar and voice to do the next shootouts.

The problem with using the Dag amp is that it may be inferior to the Gryphon.  I believe your Gryphon is the best amp for purity and most other things, so you would be comparing the softer Lux preamp + accurate Gryphon amp with the accurate Dag preamp + a softer Dag amp, a kind of apple/orange mixed comparison.  I think I remember your shootout with Dag Momentum amp against others, and it was softer than the Gryphon and even the best Pass XS300.
I started reading this thread from  it’s start in 2016 last night. I started looking up and reading reviews on every new best thing that Jay came across. Pretty fun do that really and seeing how the reviews compared to what Jay found. Five hours later I started and the last post and started reading back, as I was intrested in his thinking about how he chose the sashas that I just bought. After three hours I had not yet gotten to that story yet, but I learned that if I wait another couple of weeks, or not much longer, there will indeed be a new next best thing that I need to research. Plus I still have close to three years of history here to read about and discover some more jewels. The journey will never end until or unless the world runs out of products to discover. Then there will be the endless combinations that havnt tried before. Add in  our constantly evolving tastes and we find more than enough options to outlast either our  energy,  money, or  time. Should be great fun trying though! 
As you say in your excellent video, these tests are always plagued by ambiguity about the true reference. I personally did not care for the emphasized upper mids on the piano for #1, but this might be exactly what the engineer put on the master - like Lyle Lovett recordings. 

You have gone this far down the rabbit hole - need to take that last step. Hire a small band to play in your room and record them to analog tape using two microphones placed where the Wilsons stand. Meditate and commit the live sound to memory. I believe the Harbeth designer brings people in to sing in his listening room when tuning the speakers. Crazy hobby!

I want to just hint one thing here without giving too much away:
NO OTHER COMBINATION OF AMP/PREAMP has ever ever given me the kind of fullness, muscularity and bottom end control that i get from the momentum combo... I actually now have MORE BASS from my Sasha DAW than what i had from the Alexia 1 i owned. I will expand on this later on this week. For now, that is all you need to know.

As far as live music, i gotta be honest, maybe in my humble opinion too, i have never really enjoyed a live event because to me everything sounds like an echo in the arena. I hear like a bunch of speakers going off and the music being forced into the air and 9/10 we are never in the sweet spot (if there is such thing in an arena). Plus people won’t shut the hell up either so it is kinda hard to appreciate a live event unless you are P. Diddy who can hire the band to play in his house...

As far as the Dag S250 being inferior to the Gryphon, that is still yet to be determined to be honest. It is way too early to deduct that. It is a special power amplifier in so many ways and has beautiful tonality. There will be many shootouts such as:

DCS Vivaldi direct into Gryphon/Momentum S250

Gryphon/DCS Dac Vs Full momentum amp/preamp (dcs dac as source)

DCS/Gryphon/Momentum Preamp Vs Full momentum amp/preamp (dcs dac as source)

Then comes cable swaps on the momentum since i have already nailed what the gryphon and dcs like for cabling and last but not least lets not forget about using my Niagara 5000 on the momentum combo.

I honestly did not expect for this shootout to have so much reaction as it did. 


That’s great that the less expensive Luxman sounded better than the more expensive Dag and Ayre. Awesome result. 
And also WC very clearly stated that although #1 had more clarity than the Lux #3, that clarity aspect was irrelevant because the Luxman was WC’s overwhelming winner on sound quality. 
Sound quality wins, not clarity when it doesn’t sound as good. 

I suppose within the rarified air you are playing in, synergy among components may become more important than the component itself.

Since we are spending all of your money on private bands and singing chipmunks... before all is said and done you probably should throw one of these into the mix:

http://www.vac-amps.com/productPages/StatmentLinePreamp.html



Luxman M-900u is all I will ever need for my modest Dynaudio Special 40s. May I just say the synergy is mind blowing here. No need for more power in this case, I simply get more than needed. Where I can have fun is by playing with preamps and dacs, and alter the taste of the final result.

Sure that amp has enough juice to drive a pair of Sasha DAWs and will satisfy most audiophiles, exception made for guys like WC who crave for limit breaking bass and dynamics...
Actually....there's more to that which I didn't add...this is why I gave just partial information..