Moving cables around killed dynamics for days anyone else experience this?

alexberger

... 99% of audiophiles who try to use these kind of theories don’t have any of required knowledge.

To what "theories" do you refer? What knowledge is "required?"

Given your insistence on applying science, I have to ask: How did you arrive at your "99%" calculation?

And given your distaste for audiophile "morons" and "fanatics," will you please tell us what you hope your claims will accomplish here?

jetter

Forgetting science versus the human ear discussions ...

I don't mean to blame you, but that's part of the problem. There is no genuine "science versus the human ear discussion," because there is no conflict between science and what we hear. The two are inherently linked. That sometimes it's difficult to account for what we hear is not an indicator of any conflict, other than that invented for purposes of debate.

Real scientists probe for real answers.

alexberger

There is a big difference between real scientists and "moron audiophiles" that fanatically believe in their "scientific theories".

Logical fallacy, ad hominem attack times two. Not only do you call those audiophiles with whom you disagree morons, you also label them as fanatics.

Perhaps the difference between audiophiles and those you call "real scientists" is that the audiophiles tend to report their experiences, while those like you engage in illogic and insult.

For scientists if an experiment disproves theory, they conclude the something is wrong in the theory.

If so, that’s a poor scientist. "An experiment" can neither prove nor disprove any theory. It’s just one experiment. For the results to have any scientific validity, the experiment must then be replicated by others, and the results shared and assessed.

I have to wonder why you’re here if you think we’re morons.