Mono Cartridge Stylus


So a while back there was a thread about mono cartridges like the Miyajima. There was some confusion about stylus size and what should be used for mono re-pressings versus the original mono pressings.

So Miyajima claims that their 0.7 stylus is optimal for modern mono re-pressings and that their 1.0 stylus is for those earlier mono pressings that began in 1950. Columbia introduced the Microgroove pressing in 1948. The Microgroove pressing offers 300-400 grooves per inch and AI claims that the correct stylus for these pressings is 0.7. I will say that I don't believe Miyajima to be entirely wrong, as there were labels that still used wider grooves however, I believe nearly all of the major labels eventually adopted the Microgroove band width thus making it the norm by the early to mid 1950's.

goofyfoot

Somewhat apropos to this conversation, I just unearthed from a large collection of records that I have taken custody of, a copy of "Play Bach: The Original Jazz Interpretations of the Music of Johann Sebastian Bach" by the Jacques Loussier Trio.  This one is volume 3, so maybe there is more in store.  I am listening to it as I key this note.  It is quite good, very much in the vein of MJQ.  According to the liner notes this guy made Bach music in a jazz context into a career.  It is very well done.  It is on London, PS 289 if you are interested.  With respect to Chick Corea, I think I have all of his records.  My favorite without question is the one he did with Bela Fleck.

I have all 3 of those “Play Bach” LPs. They were great fun but I haven’t had a listen in decades. I should pull one out for a spin.

I'd favor listening to PDQ Bach. I saw the professor live at CCM many years ago.

 

@dogberry: I currently have a Decca 4RC sitting at the London/Decca office in England, waiting for me to choose between the original stock size conical stylus and the line contact that London offers. Having them rebuild it as a mono model has also been swirling around in my brain. I already have two stereo London’s, but the Decca 4RC has a different motor structure and cartridge body construction (and therefore sound character) than later Deccas (and of course Londons), which I anxiously await hearing.