My new full-range driver blh with floor boundary re-enforcement hits 30hz strong is an honest 96db 1 watt 1 meter can play pipe organ at high SPL and does all the other things full ranges excel at. I also have a few giant horns systems and all of those are better but much much larger. Still, I disagree with you about horns working well in smaller rooms if set up properly they can perform very well indeed. And the SEAS Thors to me is one of the worst sounding dynamics I have ever owned. My friend owns Madisound I have much experience with it. If you’re using that to compare to.........Most anything would sound better.
Midwoofer+Tweeter vs Wide band
90%++ of our usic, Especially classical music,, falls in the 500hz-say 2500hz range.
Now I FIJNALLY!!!! Understand all the fuss and issues with a midwoofer/tweeter thing.
Mid woofers are attempting to do 2 things, carry bass and carry 500hz-say 1500/2khz.
Tweeters, those tiny lil 1/2 inch vc's are trying tp voice 1500/2khz thriugh 10khz/15khz
Now i finally grasp whats going on here. with sens level at no more than 90db, most drivers are actually below 85dbm, regardless what the lab specs states.
vs
Wide bands
These higher quality speakers , voice easily, with no stress and a perfect meshing on the 60hz-12khz, anda seamless gorgeous musical image.
Witha TRUE REAL, Not hyped 92db sens.
habds down the wide band 8 inch easily performs far superior to Wilson's mega money speaker line.
I have no idea why the american audiophile will not accept the truth, the reality, of the wide band 8 inch speaker performance over the box Wilson.Vandersteen, Magnepan, Thiel speaker design.
The chinese audiophile has long ago dumped the low sens multi driver design for the single 8 inch wide band design.
There is not even 1 speaker with muti drivers that offer the least interest , now that i have made the wide band discovery.
Its really a no brainer
Yet facts show the american audiophile ain't budging one bit towards the wide band speaker.
I can give 3 reasons why the multi thing has failed
And I can give 3 reasons to go wide band as speaker of choice
I can not find even 1 good reason to stay multi speaker.
Although I am using my wide band with Seas W 18's dual, and a tweeter.
Still its really a single wide band speaker, not multi.
Many of you here have even yet to hear a new wide band.
Why the resistance?
Now I FIJNALLY!!!! Understand all the fuss and issues with a midwoofer/tweeter thing.
Mid woofers are attempting to do 2 things, carry bass and carry 500hz-say 1500/2khz.
Tweeters, those tiny lil 1/2 inch vc's are trying tp voice 1500/2khz thriugh 10khz/15khz
Now i finally grasp whats going on here. with sens level at no more than 90db, most drivers are actually below 85dbm, regardless what the lab specs states.
vs
Wide bands
These higher quality speakers , voice easily, with no stress and a perfect meshing on the 60hz-12khz, anda seamless gorgeous musical image.
Witha TRUE REAL, Not hyped 92db sens.
habds down the wide band 8 inch easily performs far superior to Wilson's mega money speaker line.
I have no idea why the american audiophile will not accept the truth, the reality, of the wide band 8 inch speaker performance over the box Wilson.Vandersteen, Magnepan, Thiel speaker design.
The chinese audiophile has long ago dumped the low sens multi driver design for the single 8 inch wide band design.
There is not even 1 speaker with muti drivers that offer the least interest , now that i have made the wide band discovery.
Its really a no brainer
Yet facts show the american audiophile ain't budging one bit towards the wide band speaker.
I can give 3 reasons why the multi thing has failed
And I can give 3 reasons to go wide band as speaker of choice
I can not find even 1 good reason to stay multi speaker.
Although I am using my wide band with Seas W 18's dual, and a tweeter.
Still its really a single wide band speaker, not multi.
Many of you here have even yet to hear a new wide band.
Why the resistance?