Midwoofer/tweeter speaker

**MID + ** Woofer**.  So you are saying this speaker can  voice both fq's?

**Mid** + **Tweeter** , Again same idea, both lower highs (mids) +  high fqs,  voiced in one unit.

Is this what Seas ScanSpeak, SB Acoustics is claiming?

I don't believe it.

I just ain'ty buying.

In my research/experimentations, the one  struggles  in fq's above say,,ohh I dont  know, maybe 1800hz, TOPS, ,,IF THAT..,,and the  **Mid** /tweeter , attempting fq's below,,,oh I dont know,  lets say 3k hz. 

 There

's a  signifucant gap there folks, and worse of all, the 1600 - 3khz, is the very heart, sould life bllod of our music.

Especially my classical cd collection, where core mid fq's, is everything.

 I dont know what say you?

Here's where my dual FR  shine in the super duper critcal fq mid-zone.

All my  1950's operas never sound so live, as if you are on the front row seat. Higher sens + seamless mid range. Huge advantages over your  commercial/consumer box speakers.

*Mid* woofer + *Mid* tweeter, nice try but no cigar.

Note:: have you seen what all the big labs are doing lately,,, sticking a  whole bunch of speakers ina  cabinet , in a  vain, worthless attempt to equal what a Full Range can perform in the mid core fq  band width.

More does not, never did, never will fill in a  hz range that is not in their ability to voice. 

Redundancy. Louder , for sure,

But the flaw remains.

You will not understand  this post unless you actually place a  FR next to your speaker.

I m talking Wilson;s Monolithic towers, with 6-8 speakers in each cabinet.