Maybe critical listening skills are bad?


In another thread about how to A/B compare speakers for a home I was thinking to myself, maybe the skills a reviewer may use to convey pros and cons of a speaker to readers is a bad skill to use when we evaluate hardware and gear?

I'm not against science, or nuance at all.  I was just thinking to myself, do I really want to spend hours A/B testing and scoring a speaker system I want to live with?

I do not actually.  I think listening for 2 days to a pair of speakers, and doing the same to another pair I need to focus first on what made me happy.  Could I listen to them for hours?  Was I drawn to spend more time with music or was I drawn to writing  minutiae down?

And how much does precise imaging really do for my enjoyment by the way?  I prefer to have a system that seems endless.  As if I'm focusing my eyes across a valley than to have palpable lung sounds in my living room.

Anyway, just a thought that maybe we as consumers need to use a different skill set when buying than reviewers do when selling.

erik_squires

My argument about precise imaging was about how in person listening I don’t get the same imaging illusion. If I close my eyes I can’t place instruments nearly as well as I demand from my stereo.

I argue that we seek out imaging that is too precise because we lack the visual information. It’s like Kurosawa adding smoke to a volcano because the film won’t convey heat.

Whatever your thoughts are on imagine though, it's just another detail which we may be so critical of we fail to actually enjoy the experience.

If we can agree that we see differences in art or beauty that are are a consequence of physical, mental, and perhaps emotional, we begin to see the complexity in which are audio preferences are shaped.

We generally arrange our music systems to fit our surroundings. The speakers won't care, the cables won't either, if you are only getting 30% of the performance from them. If we want more precision, like picking up on a fine cable or vibration control, we need to push further.

IMO we need to get our rooms right if we want to learn to listen critically, otherwise there are too many variables. We will find good sound, but only with a perfectly set room, with extreme attention to reflection points (if you want imaging), etc. will the fruits of your labors be rewarded.

I've learned to set up my systems, and it's always meant repositioning speakers (not dedicated space most of the years). I've really been able to appreciate the nuances of a Nordost cable, or a dedicated line. IME most box speakers want to be 4-5 feet from the rear wall and a few feet from the sides. Put your speakers on beach towels, make big moves with them, look and create a listening hall in your room, create symmetry, soften the space with rugs and some diffusion. Play with filling the corners with pillows and place blankets around. Start big and refine.

So many times we have huge speakers in a shoe box room, inches from the walls with little thought of your hall, your room, the greater speaker, gets strangled in the chaos of confusion and suppression of the sound. 

I would suggest an approach that's brought me some fun...think of your next listening session as hosting a concert in your space. Position your gear to get the most out of it (this has to be part of the audiophile process IMO). It might take 5-10 'concerts' to do this, but once your found your best stage or hall, or atmosphere, and volume, where there is no strain in the amp or overhang in the bass, your critical job is done so enjoy (until you pop in a new interconnect lol). 

From this 'fundamental' positioning (whether it's permanent if dedicated or whatever) you have a new base to experiment with tone from a new tube, or a new power cable, etc. Most important thing to me is to enjoy this experience, have fun, and learn to have those performers emotion and passion in your room. Like anything else in life it takes lots of work and energy. Good luck.

"How much do I hear?” 

“That’s metaphysically absurd, man! How could I know what you hear?”

Firesign Theatre, Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers

@erik_squires wrote:

I argue that we seek out imaging that is too precise because we lack the visual information.

+1

When I first got serious about spending serious dollars in this hobby back in the mid 80's I had a subscription to Stereophile. It was my scripture and I read each review assured these guys knew what they were talking about. Many years and lots of gear later I realized that just because a reviewer says a piece is good, does not mean I will. No one can tell an individual what they will/won't like, only that person can make that decision.