Marantz SACD player suggestion


My Yamaha CD-S2100 SACD player died and looking to replace it in similar price range (but would never buy another Yamaha). There are 2 Marantz SACD players in the $3K range - SACD 30N and the SA-KI Ruby. Unfortunately, neither has balanced outputs. Any thoughts on the sonic differences between the two? Or how about the Technics SL-G700, which is balanced? Thanks.

drowe

Showing 2 responses by nonoise

Well, The Technics has a cleaner, introspective presentation to the music whereas the Marantz had that warmth they’re know for at the cost of that clean and open sound that I like.

Providing a cleaner presentation goes hand in hand with layering, soundstage width and depth, air, ambience, that elusive see-through quality, room (that it’s recorded in) contribution also known as venue, etc.

The Technics also beats the Marantz in dynamics, micro and macro, scale, insight, subtlety, and realism. Some might not appreciate these qualities as much as me so YMMV. Having lived with both, I can see why some would prefer the Marantz, if they want everything to sound good, but I feel it would be at the expense of the aforementioned qualities I mentioned.

Granted, some of the differences alone were not that major but taken as a whole, the sum is greater than the parts.

All the best,
Nonoise

I had a Marantz SA15S2 and loved it while I had it. I sold my Marantz gear and got the Technics SU-G700M2 and liked it so much I got the matching SL-G700 SACD player and compared it to the Marantz while I still had it. 

No comparison.

Before anyone flames this, don't forget the Marantz was almost a decade old while the Technics is pretty much cutting edge. The fact that you can get it for around the same price, if not less, than a used Marantz, puzzles me. Chalk it up to nostalgia.

All the best,
Nonoise