Magico Pods vs Townshend Seismic Platforms

@jallan 

Join the network!

https://raspberryshake.org

Not only do you get to monitor your own environment. But you join thousands of other siesmographs and can track events from seismograph to seismograph. Great tools are included. 

A Manufacturer usually had a Sales Spiel and Makes Claims for a Product being quite suitable for a Particular Role.

I have a Analogue Source > Range of Phonostages Options and furthest Downstream I have ESL Speakers and a Selection of Cabinet Speakers to use in a variety of configurations.

For the Analogue Source currently used, I moved on from AT 616 Pneumatic Separators to SolidTech 'Feet of Silence' as the Top Tier of Separators in contact with the TT Plinth.

 AT 616 Pneumatic Separators are also used under Cabinet Speakers as the Top Tier on Sub Support Assembly.

I am a user of a Product that is being made known can be easily identified and sourced as a purchase if wanted, I had no complication buying both types and one type I have purchased on a few occasions to increase the qty owned.

I have no vested interest in any product mentioned, and no communication with any commercial entity that makes these products available. 

My attraction to a Product is made known as a result of an experience had and an impression made, I have nothing for sale or nothing to be offered to me as a gratuity for encouraging a sale.

My reports are not related in any way to Puffery and are certainly not Shilling.

When an individual is making inroads to finding ways to manage Migrating Amplitude and is buying into products where an outcome is that a discovery is  something that has a impact on the End Sound experienced that is perceived as a Betterment in their unique environment and formed space for Kinetic Energy to move in. When taking the time to be helpful and make a report to others with inquiries, where does the misinforming come into it.  

When others do similar, and are with sound experiences in assessing sound, in a report made, where does the misinforming come into it.        

My experiences, as a result of loaning Separation Devices into a range of systems has led me to the place, where I am convinced there is not a ubiquitous methodology to Tame Amplitude in a Particular Environment and Space.

I am friends with quite a few who use Townsend - Gaia - Stack Audio 50 > 70.

Through association I know even more who use Townsend - Gaia.

I would not suggest to any, they may have an ancillary used as a Separator that is not a benefit to the End Sound produced in their Environment and Space for listening to replayed recorded music.   

As usual don't know what the F pindic is saying! Oh well.

@ghdprentice Thanks for the link! I checked it out, I have a few seismologist friends in the area I will ping on (fellow Geological Society of Washington members). 

Furutech Project V1 this as a suggestion as a Purchase is is the purest of 'Puffery'.

For myself it takes months of being able to regularly experience a device before a assessment of an item for its real Value, and gives confidence it is worthwhile mentioning as a consideration. I doubt very much this has occurred in relation to the V1, with the limited info made available, it is very easy to assume the item has been in earshot for a short period of time in a unfamiliar system, hence the Puffery associated with the suggestion being very relevant. 

I myself have been making it known I am an advocate of using D.U.C.C Wire - PC Triple C - PC Triple C / EX for certain roles in the home audio system for many years. 

The Wire used within the Cable is a substantial Influence. How the Cable is structured is a way for a Manufacturer to add substantial cost to a Wire that can be costed as a base material very cheaply. The Wire being used to produce a very affordable Cable and then compared to a very expensive Cable using the same Wire, does not create a comparison that results in a outcome where differences are easily discerned. The most discernible differences begin to manifest when the Cables being compared Terminations / Connector Types are undergoing exchanges to introduce various types, this is where the separation in impression made really reveals itself.

To evaluate Cables, requires a system to be used that is very familiar to the individual doing an assessment, it requires comparison and revisits to a comparison, and revisits to different preferred product over a course of months to finalise the assessment. 

The outcome of a Cable assessment means one thing, the findings are only discovered on a particular system, will the results of such investigation be an outcome that is ubiquitous - No!!!