Madman! Digital vs Vinyl

My analog rig ( vpi classic 3, zephyr mimc*, ear 834 phono pre) just sounds warmer than my digital setup (chord qutest w, curious usb cable, rega Saturn CD player) They both sound great. 
it’s just a matter of how much time I have to critically listen. Some recording on hi res or master sound almost identical to vinyl. Roxy music/Avalon, is very close. 
All the police albums sound better on vinyl. U2 sounds fantastic as well on vinyl. 
Just  depends on the recording. 

I have the monaural Brandenburg Concertos three-disc set performed by Felix Prohaska and the Vienna State Orchestra. I play it on a midfi setup with a stereo AT-VM95ML cartridge. I haven't seen it available on any other medium, so vinyl is best.

Two totally different versions, Madman on the Tumbleweed deluxe has Mick Ronson on guitar and is a great version.

I sold my $15k tt setup a few years ago and every vinyl album I had. I also did numerous comparisons between vinyl and hi res digital (dsd, MQA, 24/192), and digital won. 

I have 4 or 5 non-US pressings of Tumbleweed that are early, including a couple UK DJMs and some other early ex-US DJM pressings. The earliest UK pressing I have here actually has less pronounced bass than some of the others. (Sorry don't have the matrices to hand). I do have an SACD of it too, which sounds fine for what it is, but I'm far more advanced on vinyl playback than I am on digital. I had Qobuz for a little while but found that it didn't have what I was chasing-- stuff that is unobtaninum on vinyl, hard to find, private or small label. It did sound pretty good for what it was, though. (Don't remember if I tried Tumbleweed via Qobuz when I was using it). 

I think a lot depends on system.