2. speakers
  3. 1137434532

m & k subs ?

i am in the market for a new subwoofer. i had an m & k mx100 for about 15 years before it finally gave out. the sub is mainly used for movies. i am just wondering if i should stick to m & k or start investigating other avenues. i have found very little feedback on this website about m & k compared to other brands so i was starting to doubt if m & k is still one of the better ones out there. i have snell c/v as my lcr snell e/II for sides and snell k/II for rears all driven with mcintosh equipment. i was ready to pull the trigger on a m & k mx350 but now would consider any suggestions that audiogon members might think to be a better option. thanks in advance for any feedback you may give me!
flognam

Showing 1 response by michaela

michaela
314 posts
 
I think for HT purposes they are still excellent subs. I used to use an MX105 mkII in a combined music/HT room. At the time I used the room for more HT than music and the sub could shake the walls. M&K subs are excellent for HT. I've since made a changeover to more music and traded the M&K for a REL Strata III. For music, the REL is much better. It blends better and yields a more defined bass. Hope this helps.

Mike.
More to discover