Luxman 509 or McIntosh 8900


Hello all!

Been doing a great amount of research on getting a new "buy once, cry once" integrated amp..  Ive narrowed this down to the Luxman 509x and McIntosh 8900..  Ill be running this into a pair of Polk 707's which I am very happy with and prob won't be upgrading for 5-10 years.  

This would be streaming mostly and USB HiRes..  The McIntosh has the old DA1 module and I would get a separate streaming DAC for the Luxman.  Moderate listening levels.  The Polk's are 87db efficient and 250-300 watts recommended I believe.

Any feed back, suggestions would be great!!

Oh, and I have heard the McIntosh with Cornwalls and LOVED it..  I can not find a dealer to hear the Luxman..  So the Luxman would be a purchase off of suggestion only.  

- Brian
bdcody01

Showing 1 response by ei001h

agree with eziggy

Mcintosh is very smooth, lush, powerful, warm. I have a mc452 and used to have ma6600. Both had the same signature, though mc452 is much more refined. I'm pairing it with sonus Faber speakers, which are also warm sounding with rolling off highs. Piano and other instruments do not sound as real with SF. I've heard Luxman, more neutral presentation and not as warm as mc. So it depends what sound you're looking for. If you want a beautiful non fatiguing warm sound go for Mcintosh. For a more real presentation go with Luxman. Also depends on your speakers. Mcintosh is great for brighter speakers. Comparing both, Luxman looks much more refined aesthetically, seems higher quality material and craftsmanship.