yes, seriously.
Showing 9 responses by builder3
nutella216 posts01-18-2020 7:34am Global historical records from NOAA are the basis for the charts and models indicated in that article in the op. https://youtu.be/mGe9JO58Uc8 There you go. Ask yourself this, people. If man-made climate change is such an impending catastrophe, why would the government propose that gigantic industries be allowed to purchase some "carbon credits", to the tune of hundreds of millions, or billions, of dollars, rather than address the "issue"? https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/greta_thunbergs_fantastic_voyage_for_socialism_exem... |
nonoise5,276 posts01-18-2020 4:40pm.......Or more accurately, took exception to the Canadian government telling him he was required to address people by a specific pronoun. I'm not in favor of quashing free speech. It's one of our amendments immediately south of Canada. |
What's with the name calling, nonoise? It doesn't add anything to your argument. The last video of Peterson's that I looked at was over a year ago, and I stumbled on the one I linked when it popped up in my climate change search. I'll admit I like him, and I'd say that his critical thinking is right up there. Just my opinion. You disagree? Swell. Comparing him to Glenn Beck is a non-starter to anyone serious. Who's next, Bill O'Reilly? I gotta say, if there's anyone more intolerant than the tolerant left, I've yet to see them. |
It's okay, he's gone now. The bad man has been erased from the playground, it's safe to come out. djones, I'm not sure you should be talking about anyone spouting bile, your posts have been dripping with it. But hey, mission accomplished. I'm not interested in sticking around, it's pointless. And to the bulk of you, take care. |