There is no intelligence in AI, that’s supposed to come from the human performing the query. The output from ChatGPT will vary depending on how you structure your query.
You present the ChatGPT output as if it was an Authoritative answer from a Superior Being. What if we all posted our ChatGPT output? Based on how we ask the question, we’ll all get a different response.
Would you want to have to wade through that?
The OP and everyone else can also query ChatGPT, so what value do you think you are providing?
It’s one thing to treat ChatGPT as a research assistant but to not validate the output is pretty lazy. Fact checking is where the real work begins.
Did you ask for sources? Where did ChatGPT get this data? From professional audio reviewers and trade magazines (ex: TAS or Stereophile)? If you don’t ask for sources you won’t know. I’d rather read the source directly so I can form my own opinion rather than have a Pattern Recognition Tool create an opinion for me.
Finally, AI’s often "hallucinate" or lie. If you point out an error in ChatGPT’s output it will typically respond with something like "You make an excellent point! I’ll incorporate that change in my responses from now on."
AI can be used for a lot of good purposes. I recommend you ask ChatGPT what it’s best use is, based on its strengths. Posting on Audiogon won’t be one of them.