As in your example where I have multiple copies of the same musics SQ is rarely the major issue. I am usually attracted to simple things like tempos and dynamics that tend to define the performance. Think Kleiber's Beethoven's 5th, or Richter's 1958 Sofia live recording. Kleiber's SQ is OK, Richter's Sofia is abysmal but the performances are essential if not definitive. FWIW, I'm no longer attracted to a recording because of its SQ - I'm more interested in new performers, new music, new performances of familar music. My system is good enuf for me so I don't really think about SQ, and frankly don't want to. Intrudes too much. (That is why I gave away my vinyl system, I found myself too connected to SQ at the expense of immersion into the music.)
In Classical music the effect of SQ on appreciation
In classical music there are often many different versions of a single composition that you may own or listen to. How much influence does SQ have on your appreciation?
As a recording is an artifact in itself, the presentation of the sonic factor has to come into the equation as does the interpretation.
in Mahler, as an example, the orchestration is vital.
A recording that is just so-so interpretively may be very attractive to the listener because of the sterling sonics of the orchestra.
So, how much does the SQ affect your judgement?