Impact of a DDC using SPDIF (not I2S)


I have been toying with the idea of trying a Digital to Digital Converter to convert the output from my Innuos Zenith MKIII from USB to SPDIF. The SPDIF would then connect via AES to a Merason Reuss DAC. A likely candidate is the Denafrips Hermes DDC. 

My question, and I already know the obvious answer, 'Try it and see', is whether I would gain much converting to SPDIF. I know that this is highly component dependent. Switching away from USB into the DAC moves the clocking into the DDC vs using the DAC's clock. Many of the folks who have used DDC's successfully use the I2S input on their DAC, however the Merason Reuss does not support I2S input. 

I realize that my mileage may vary, but I am hoping to hear from others that have used a DDC to help me decide if I want to try one out. It is not an inexpensive experiment, a bit of due diligence up front is warranted. Let me know your thoughts.

zlone

My first DDC was the Hermes. I tried it on a whim, did not perceive a sonic improvement, and eventually sold it. After going a year without using a DDC, I changed some things in my system, added a Sonore Signature Rendu SE optical streamer which only has a USB output, and decided to try another DDC, mostly to have additional connection options.

I am now using a Singxer SU-6 connected to my Sig Rendu SE streamer by a short USB cable and am currently running three different DACs connected to it by AES/EBU, S/PDIF, and toslink/optical. In each case, I do not discern any loss of performance by having the DDC in the path. Using the DDC is also a great way to compare different inputs going into the same DAC since you can literally have them all connected at the same time.  The SU-6 has operated without a glitch in the 6 months or so since I have owned it.

I believe you are correct about inputs being "component dependent." None of the DACs currently in my main system have an I2S connection but I previously used I2S with Metrum’s Pavane and Adagio DACs. I didn’t hear much if any difference between I2S and the other digital inputs. I suspect the most significant sonic difference would occur between using a USB input, where the DAC’s clock does the work, and S/PDIF or AES/EBU inputs.

As discussed in the linked Singxer SU-6 review, there are likely jitter improvements associated with using a DDC, but whether those will be audible will probably depend on your system.

Denafrips actually recommends using DAC clock and Hermes can operate on Terminator (DAC) clock - this is my setup. I think DDC effect depends on quality of USB source. You may get biggest value if source is a PC which tend to be noisy. On the other hand, if the source is already good, reclocking again may or may not bring any benefits. 

 

DDCs are designed to convert outputs. If there is any sonic upgrade, existing components could only be lacking. Mine contributes no "improvement."

@fuzztone - Denafrips (or their former dealer) youtube videos actually clearly state that DDC effect depends on the source. If source is already good, there may be no effect - like there is no reason to chain 5 DDCs, right?

I2S is always better sounding 

I bought the top Wireworld  hdmi and it sounds great 

my wife has the Denafrip Iris  ddc and it really cleans up, the noise and cleans up 

the signal .