The point of this thread is that sound quality is determined not by our ears but by our brains. Our ears merely transduce the sound waves. Our brains make value judgements as to what sounds good, or which one between A and B sounds better. Just like our eyes see pictures, but it is our brains that see beauty.
None of this has to do with measurements and I’m not sure why they’re being brought into the conversation, other than the ears vs measurements trope is a familiar one.
Instead it has everything to do with whether and how much we can / should trust our brains to accurately and reliably perform nonsimultaneous A/B comparisons when it is notoriously inaccurate and suggestible in that respect. Literally tens of thousands of pages have been written on the subject, reaching far beyond audio into gastronomy, oenology, etc., and, perhaps more tragically, police lineups. People of good faith place at the crime scene with absolute certainty a person who was later proven to be 500 miles away at the time.
The train-your-brains argument is of course valid. Some of the folks who fail these tests are highly trained and have decades of experience, however, like those wine critics who couldn’t pick California wines from French once the labels were removed.
How many of us account for the fact that the subtler differences we think we’re hearing may just be our brains telling us there’s something when there’s nothing just because it seems there should be?