How long does Class A have?

Just turn up your AC as high as it can go so your amp doesn’t heat up the planet. 😂🤣

@arcticdeth +1

People who take that 14 y/o dingbat seriously aren’t the sharpest tools in the shed. 

Imagine being so under-educated that you adopt the views of a 14 y/o child. 😜🤪

Imagine being so narrow minded that you are incapable of looking past myopic preconceived regressive attitudes about a messenger that you can’t hear the message

Yes yes, the new message is the world will end in 12 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI-rhPkUag0

Yeah, only those suffering from “myopic preconceived regressive attitudes” people won’t believe that 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Better run out and go buy that bunker big guy. 😂🤣

Ps. I believe bunkers are going real cheap in Kabul. 

" while the ice cap melts away at an alarming rate."

What, they’re still here? Weren't they supposed to have melted away in 2013 already?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

"  Narcissism enabled  is the next big epidemic we will find ourselves having to address on a large scale."

Yes comrade. We should deny people who disagree with us their first amendment rights so that the only opinion that is heard is ours. 

"Nobody is going to be able to deny your rights nor the rights of others."

Now THAT is hilarious comrade.

Zuckerberg and Dorsey have all but a monopoly of social media - any opinions other than that which they support is censored. When anybody tries to create an alternative social media platform, the whole media platform is de-platformed - case in point Bezos de platforming Parler.

Allowing people a milk crate to stand on while denying them social media access isn’t freedom of speech, no matter how many times you repeat it to yourself. Political censorship is alive an well in the US and Europe. And it controlled by half a dozen unelected billionaires.

Free speech only for those who toe the party line comrade ...

" Your “Comrade” references are out of line. Bet you wouldn’t do it in person."

Bet you I would comrade.

" Well then how did you manage to just speak freely?"

I suspect that has something to do with this being audiogon and not facebook or twitter.

Businesses have the right to protect themselves and keep their houses in order. People don’t not have the right to wreck havoc in other peoples houses or places of business.

FLMAO - expressing a dissenting opinion is " to wreck havoc in other peoples houses "? Parler was wrecking havoc on AWS? LOL - you sir, are a comedian of great caliber. 

But I am proud of you comrade. When depriving others their rights, one must always convince oneself you are not. 

"There is no provision that requires private companies to do the same. Facebook and Twitter can make arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory, capricious and random decisions about the content they allow. It’s under the auspices of private property rights."

The person with lack of understanding is you.

Neither Facebook or Twitter are private companies.

This has no relation to private property rights in any way shape or form.

Facebook and Twitter are both media companies like newspapers are. Media companies can not "make arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory, capricious and random decisions about the content they allow". By law they can choose what they publish but then be liable to be sued for what they publish or refuse to.

Facebook and Twitter were given special rights protecting them from liability of what they publish to get them off the ground. Given their success, they should no longer special protections not afforded to other media companies.