How bad is it to place 5.1 rears from behind rather than on the sides?


I’m building a new setup and planned placing my 5.1 rears in-wall directly on the sides and perhaps pushing the sofa forward a bit while watching a movie. I especially wanted inwalls to avoid my youngsters messing with them and bought the Morel xbw600 two days ago for that. But renovating now, I see the only option to make them in-wall is behind me in 90 degrees (separated up to 3 meters apart).

So I’m facing a dilemma: do I place them behind or do I return them and get satellites instead that I’ll place on the sides (1.5 meters from me in each direction)? What do you smart people advise?

Illustration: https://ibb.co/86wc61J
thenoob1
The dipole surrounds have the woofers/tweeters wired in opposite phase of eachother, so yes it does create kind of a NULL where the couch is because the opposing drivers are cancelling out the sound (if the speakers are mounted directly to the sides).

At this point, it becomes more of a personal preference.  Dipole speakers are meant to produce a type of sound that is more ambient/spatious so that you cannot tell where the sound is coming from.

In comparison, Bipole or direct speakers do not do this.  I had researched this a long time ago and decided that I wanted direct sound because it is more solid and I can hear distinct sounds coming directionally from either the left surround or right surround.  It gives a bigger impact, but it is definitely a "direct sound".  You might feel different on what kind of surround you want.
I should point out, coming from a short stint in actual motion picture auditoriums, I always felt the dipole satellites were a scam. I’ve been very happy with normal speakers as surrounds, especially with the addition of 2 rears.

I have a feeling though that some of this has to do with a desire to do more with less. A typical surround auditorium usually had 2 speakers per side, and sometimes in the rear depending on the size of the room. There’s also some disagreement by the recording engineers about what they want surround sound to DO. Is it strictly spectacle? Is it immersive? Should I locate a bullet that just wizzed by or should the sound be more diffused?

Fortunately audio keeps progressing into giving the movie makers more control over these choices, and they are less dependent on built in obstacles in the surround technology itself.
Thank you all for sharing your valuable experience. It sounds to me that weighing out the different circumstances of my house, monopole sides will work best for me. Though before mounting them on the wall, I’ll first give them a try both on the sides as well as on the back.  
There are some surround speakers which have two pairs or drivers and are switchable between a dipole or bipole configuration.  If you really wanted to see for yourself, you could try the "dipole" sound and compare with the "bipole" (which essentially give you the same effect as monopole).
You are so close to a nice 7.1 set up with all 7 speakers on stands. All you need do is pull the couch forward and little, enough for speakers to be as they are in in your first figure, behind you. a bit wider than your L/R pair. 5.1 to 7.1 is addtional speakers on the sides, toward the back of the room maybe 3/4 of the way. You could then add 2 or 4 speakers overheard in the ceiling and you’d have ATMOS! Small rooms actually are better for this if you dont over power them with big speakers. Nice small speakers like Genelecs or soemthing like that would be ideal.

Erik is right, dipoles are a thing being "sold" to consumers; nothing is mixed that way or built that way in the studio. I would not use them as nothing would sound its best that way. Especially when standard speakers work fine and are easiy to move around until you get a good "blend" between front, sides and rears (where you dont hear a big dip in level between speakers from a source that moves across all of them).
Brad