Use yer earballs for setup...a test CD (I use one of the Stereophile CDs) helps but really that's all the technocrap needed unless, well...you can't hear. Also, listening to music is always a good idea. I have 3 RELs bought used over the years and they're great...two for hifi and one for video (different rooms). 200 bucks of so each. One monster Mackie in my music studio also...that one goes down to 19hz and weighs a ton (Mackie HRS 120, no longer made but a way cool 92 lb. beauty). Subs add reality to the show as life (remember that?) is full of natural lowness (frequencies, not "low lifes" although those exist also...my uncle Phil was one...man...) which is why your main speakers will sound happier with subs.
Help with choosing sub-woofers please
Having survived more than 30 years using full-range electrostatics @clearthinker has finally decided to get sub-woofer(s). Previously he was put off by the well-known difficulty in setting the cross-over to allow a seamless integration. Modern sub design and electronic aids seem to have fixed that.
@clearthinker is pretty knowledgeable and experienced in most aspects of two channel audio. He has spent some hours researching sub-woofers but he's having trouble evaluating the benefits of differing design and application approaches. Such matters are not dealt with qualitatively or comparatively in most postings and videos. He has yet to listen to any and will be trying contenders in his system. But it needs to be narrowed down as he can't try them all.
His Martin Logan CLX Anniversaries are -3dB at 56dB and driven by vintage Krell 200 KRS References. The room is 23 x 15.5 x 8.5 feet, carpeted, plaster ceiling, All walls are deadened with French style fabric covering and 25mm of wool behind. Symmetrical, no windows. No furnishing save equipment, two chairs and a small side table. Subs will be spiked to concrete floor. @clearthinker listens to two channel stereo all genres, no theatre in this room. Cost is not the most critical issue.
Some of the issues that need evaluating (in no particular order) are:
* Benefit of subs using two opposing drivers to reduce vibration, rock and roll
* Floor firing vs. side firing
* How much does size matter? Small is better if all things are not too unequal
* Benefit of two subs to create stereo image. Many say bass isn't very directional below about 50Hz. But bass heard above that on the MLs is certainly directional
* To what extent will the sound deadening deal with room modes? Some say bass waves go straight through wall treatments back to the hard surface behind and bounce right out again
* Benefit of two subs (or more?) optimally arranged to cancel room modes. The unlamented Miller who was rude but knew a fair bit about audio used to mention six and eight. There is freedom to locate.
* Taking unit price into consideration, is it better to have one hi-end sub, two decent ones or multiple smaller cheaper subs to deal with room modes?
* Do wireless feeds work well or is good old wire better? How much does wire choice matter in feeding subs (that may be a long way from the amp. Incidentally the Audio Research Ref 6 is fully balanced.
* Is the KEFKc62 too good to be true?
* Does it make sense to keep it simple and just to use ML subs and digital set up systems with ML main speakers? If so, is it worth spending more to get the Balanced Force series?
* What about REL?
* Anyone else?
Thanks in advance for all your posts. I'm hoping a discussion of qualitative and comparitive issues will help others get to the bottom of optimal sub-woofer applications.