Try a Stax CA-Z, if you can find one.
9 responses Add your response
Can't comment on the Carver, but had the Hafler 110 built as a kit by myself. It worked great, but compared to some of the similar pre's of the time, I thought the Hafler was a bit on the hard sounding side, mostly noticed in the upper mids. Was slight, but audible. I purchased a used B&K Pro 5 preamp and found it better sounding. As Ralph says, there are others than these two. |
what does the robbergerman NOT have in his vast collection ? i built so many 110, 101, 200, etc putting myself thru University....a very competent preamp and others have mentioned more “ off the shelf” modification available.... BUT Ralph makes a good point, you have lots of choices...ONE of my favorite low. $ ss preamps is the acoustat RP-2 or in tubes a CJ PV-2 or Ralphs entry level pre.... |
These guys offer significant(and reasonably priced) upgrades, for the DH-110, should you desire. ie: http://www.musicaldesign.com/MC_Haf_premod.html Just FYI: With the 110; an MC phono stage was optional(something to ask a seller about, if a concern). The Hafler is fully discrete(no op-amps in signal path). The later productions(black pebble finish/Rockford) had gold-plated RCAs, metal-film resistors and went to Polypropylene capacitors, from Polystyrene(desirable changes). |
Carver and Phase Linear are very detailed but forward sounding preamps. It’s like sitting on stage as opposed to 7th row center like most preamps, or row 25 like Marantz.. I like it sometimes, but listening fatigue is the order of the day. Conversely, I could listen to Sansui and Marantz all day long. Some McIntosh and Citation gear as well. I would lean towards the Hafler. it was always well thought of. |
Post removed |