Had Three Different Speaker Thoughts; Now A Fourth


I currently have B&W 606 S2 bookshelves and I am thinking about doing something different, I haven't been overwhelmed by their build or performance. So I read and read and read some more and I think I have it narrowed down to three choices. Auditioning any of them is highly unlikely.

I've looked at the Tannoy Eaton, the Volti Razz and the Magnepan 1.7.

My listening room is 12x25 and there's not a lot of room for moving my LP (odd closet and a center of house chimney). 
I have a Parasound Halo6 Integragrated. 
Given the size of the room would the Razz be too much? This is my top choice.

The fourth option a friend mentioned and it has appeal is this... I also own a pair of Polk RTiA7 towers. They are a really nice cabinet with a nice build that house a 6.5 and two 7 inch drivers and a tweeter. He said I should think about replacing the drivers with Scan Speaks and upgrading the crossovers.

Thoughts?
dadork

Showing 1 response by helomech

Regarding Maggies, consider the .7s instead. They’re better balanced, more efficient, and more dynamic than the 1.7. Despite being 2-ways, the .7s give up nothing in midrange quality compared to the 3-way 1.7s. The only real advantage of the latter is possibly a higher max SPL (at the cost of more juice).

Maggies tend to sound best with an isosceles triangle setup, the panels placed on the short side. That might be an advantage in your 12’ wide room.

Haven’t heard the Voltis but they might be a good option since you’re coming from the B&W sound.

The Spatial Audio M5 Sapphire is another you should consider. Spatials have a sound that falls somewhere between an planar-magnetic panel and a conventional box speaker. Not as much soundstage depth and not quite as transparent as Maggies but they’re higher in detail and bass extends lower. Good tweeters in the Spatials, the quality level of which are typically found only in >$6K/pair speakers.