GaN FET Amps vs. Traditional Class D Amps


I'm trying to get a better understanding of GaN FET amplifier technology. Whenever I see a write up on GaN FET based amplifiers they are always compared against class A or class A/B amps. What I'm more interested in is how they compare to the current generation of 'traditional' class D designed amplifiers, both technically and sonically. Can anyone explain it to me?

 

Thank you.

mcraghead

Showing 3 responses by mapman

GanFET technology and Class D amplifiers both represent advancements in amplifier design, but they have distinct characteristics and advantages. Here’s a comparison of the two:

### 1. **Technology Basis**
- **GanFET Technology**: Utilizes Gallium Nitride transistors, which offer superior performance characteristics compared to traditional silicon-based transistors. This includes faster switching speeds and better thermal performance.
- **Class D Amplifiers**: Typically use MOSFETs (Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors) and operate by rapidly switching the output devices on and off to control the power delivered to the load.

### 2. **Sound Quality**
- **GanFETs**: Known for producing a sound quality that can rival Class A amplifiers, with a smooth upper midrange and controlled bass. They are often described as having a more natural sound due to their minimal feedback requirements, which helps avoid harshness [[3]](https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=183615.0).
- **Class D**: While modern Class D amplifiers have improved significantly in sound quality, they can still exhibit artifacts such as distortion and ringing, especially at lower frequencies. Traditional Class D designs have often been criticized for their sound quality compared to linear amplifiers [[1]](https://futureaudiophile.com/what-the-hell-is-a-gan-gallium-nitride-amp-and-why-is-it-changing-the-way-audiophiles-now-see-power-amps/).

### 3. **Efficiency**
- **GanFETs**: Achieve efficiencies of up to 95%, which means they waste very little energy as heat. This allows for smaller and lighter designs without the need for large heatsinks [[3]](https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=183615.0).
- **Class D**: Also highly efficient, typically around 90-95%, but may not achieve the same level of performance in terms of sound quality as GanFETs when designed with lower-quality components [[1]](https://futureaudiophile.com/what-the-hell-is-a-gan-gallium-nitride-amp-and-why-is-it-changing-the-way-audiophiles-now-see-power-amps/).

### 4. **Size and Weight**
- **GanFETs**: Their high efficiency allows for compact designs, making them lighter and easier to integrate into various audio setups [[1]](https://futureaudiophile.com/what-the-hell-is-a-gan-gallium-nitride-amp-and-why-is-it-changing-the-way-audiophiles-now-see-power-amps/).
- **Class D**: Generally compact as well, but the size can vary significantly based on the design and components used.

### 5. **Load Handling**
- **GanFETs**: Capable of driving difficult loads, such as planar or electrostatic speakers, effectively. This versatility makes them suitable for a wider range of applications [[1]](https://futureaudiophile.com/what-the-hell-is-a-gan-gallium-nitride-amp-and-why-is-it-changing-the-way-audiophiles-now-see-power-amps/).
- **Class D**: While many Class D amplifiers can handle various loads, they may struggle with very low impedance loads unless specifically designed for such applications.

### 6. **Cost and Availability**
- **GanFETs**: Currently, GanFET amplifiers can be more expensive due to the cost of Gallium Nitride technology and the relatively new market presence. However, prices are expected to decrease as the technology matures [[1]](https://futureaudiophile.com/what-the-hell-is-a-gan-gallium-nitride-amp-and-why-is-it-changing-the-way-audiophiles-now-see-power-amps/).
- **Class D**: Generally more established in the market, with a wide range of options available at various price points, making them more accessible to consumers.

### Conclusion
In summary, GanFET technology offers several advantages over traditional Class D amplifiers, particularly in sound quality and efficiency. While Class D amplifiers have made significant strides in performance, GanFETs represent a newer, potentially superior option for audiophiles seeking high-fidelity sound with the benefits of modern technology.

---
Learn more:
1. [What the Hell is a GaN Amp and Why Audiophiles Care](https://futureaudiophile.com/what-the-hell-is-a-gan-gallium-nitride-amp-and-why-is-it-changing-the-way-audiophiles-now-see-power-amps/)
2. [Orchard Audio Bosc (GaNFET Class D) vs. Hypex & Co. ? | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum](https://audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/orchard-audio-bosc-ganfet-class-d-vs-hypex-co.15980/)
3. [Class D Showdown: Purifi vs. Gan5](https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=183615.0)

All "traditional" Class D amps do NOT sound the same.  You have to compare specific models.  The devil is in the details.

In general GanFet  ups the ante in terms of performance level possible. Does not mean all GanFets are necessarily better.

I have several Class D amps including Hypex Ncore,  Class D Audio GanFET, and other chip based Class D amps. Have owned "high end" Icepower in the past as well.

They are all good but each different.  The Class D Audio GanFET is the best performer in all regards.  HYpex Ncore is no slouch but sounds clearly different.  That’s just one specific Hypex Ncore amp.  There are many designs  at various price points with different power supplies, opamps used, etc.   You have to compare specific models to draw any meaningful conclusions.