From Cadenza Black to A95...


I recently acquired an Ortofon A95 cartridge to replace my Ortofon Cadenza Black. I wasn't in the market for a new cartridge. In fact, the CB is a great sounding cart that I have been very much enjoying. The CB has a clean and open presentation that reveals the music in the grooves with confidence and clarity while being on the slightly more revealing side of neutral. (It is the yin to the Cadenza Bronze's slightly warmish yang.) I've been very satisfied with the CB to the extent that I haven't seriously thought about replacing it until now. So why the change? Well, I came upon a screaming deal for the A95 that was just too good to pass on. (By the way, feel free to skip down to the Listening Impressions sections below if you just want the summary.)

After having heard the A95 is various setups over the years (particularly those with VPI turntables), reading the very well written reviews by Andre Jennings (Absolute Sound) and Myles Astor (Positive Feedback), and knowing Ortofon cartridges to be consistently strong performers across the board, I decided to take the plunge. My vinyl rig consists of a VPI Classic 3 turntable with Classic 3 tonearm------> Nordost Valhalla tonearm cable terminated with XLR connections on both ends------> ASR Basis Exclusive phono preamp. Wireworld Gold Eclipse XLR interconnects lead out from the ASR to the linestage. The VPI Classic 3 (now called Classic Signature) is known to be a bold and assertive table. I've read it described as the "American muscle car of turntables," which I think is an apt description. So I had a slight concern that combining the A95 with it might be too much of a good thing. Otherwise, I was eager to get the A95 in my system and hear what more than twice the MSRP ($2,730 vs. $6,500) would give me from an Ortofon perspective.

Though I've done some cartridge installation with lesser cartridges before, I decided to have the A95 professionally installed by Scott Dalzell at Viva Hifi here in the DC area. Initially, I decided on a VTF of 2.38 during the break-in stage of about 50 hours or so. I loaded the cartridge at 95 ohms, just shy of the recommended 100.

Music: While I listened to a lot of different music during this time, I particularly listened to the following for setup and evaluation--

1) The Stanley Clarke Trio (with Hiromi and Lenny White)- Jazz In the Garden; tracks: Isotope, Bass Folk Song No. 5 & 6.
* Chosen to test bass response and groove distortion. This Heads Up (Telarc) pressing exhibits quite a bit of groove distortion with the CB.

2) Laurel Masse- Alone Together; tracks: Alone Together, Body and Soul.
* Chosen for female voice and tracking ability. The spindle hole is off-center, so the record does not rotate symmetrically.

3) Loose Ends- Zagora; tracks: the entire album.
* 80s electronica-funk dance music with very high musicianship. Chosen to test ability to image while holding the musical portrait together.

4) Thad Jones- The Magnificent Thad Jones; tracks April in Paris, Billie-Doo.
* Chosen to test ability on mono recordings.

5) Gregory Porter- Liquid Spirit; tracks: I Fall In Love Too Easily, Time is Ticking, Water Under Bridges (Rubato Version).
* Chosen to test how black the background is during quiet passages.

Initial listening impressions: Wow! While I expected some improvement, I didn't expect this much and certainly not so immediately! As I said above, the CB is a great cartridge, but the A95 is substantially better is every way you can measure. It presents a wider and deeper soundstage (not an easy thing in my 11.5' x 19.5' x 8' room), it images better, micro-dynamics are presented with more clarity and ease, and the entire presentation has more body and presence. And this was what I heard from the very beginning! In particular, the A95's assured presentation of spacial cues improved the overall flow of the music. If I was to use one word to characterize the A95, it would be dynamic. Although it plays softer and quieter music with finesse when called upon, this is not a cart for those who want a laid-back presentation. The one (minor) criticism of the A95 in the early hours of break-in was that if anything it was too bold at times with certain albums, but I attributed some of that to the initial gain setting in the ASR (66db) and the slightly heavy initial VTF. Since I'm running balanced from the cartridge all the way through to the amps (the ASR phono pre is designed to operate that way) and my Cary SLP-05 is a high gain preamp, I could back off the gain despite the A95's 0.2 output voltage. After some tinkering, I eventually set it at 52db, which was much more ideal in my system.

After 50 hours or so: At this point, the VTF was adjusted to 2.26. That adjustment removed any remaining over-aggressiveness that the A95 had displayed during the first 20-30 hours of play. The music is now presented with a more self-assured ease without losing any of the dynamics or weight. The bass is more articulate. And micro-details and spacial cues are not spotlit or presented in a show-off manner (not that they were before), but as part of the musical whole that just flows better. The CB certainly does not produce a flat presentation, but with the A95 the music is just fuller and therefore more realistic sounding.

To put it in another context, the A95 is the first component that I have changed within the same brand that improves upon the previous component in every way possible. I've had 3 previous Cary preamps before the SLP-05, 2 previous pairs of Martin Logan speakers, and 2 previous Cary DACs/Disc players. None of my current successors comprehensively improved upon those previous components like the A95 does compared to the CB. Even the SLP-05, an all-time great tube preamp, only equals the bass slam of the SLP-2002. The CB is an exceptional major leaguer that is an occasional All-Star. The A95 is a perennial All-Star that will receive strong HOF consideration when all is said and done. I'll post more listening impressions after 100 hours or so, but make no mistake, it has already exceeded my expectations. Ortofon has hit a grand slam with the A95.
asindc
Nice review! I almost got an A95 to serve as a complement to my Koetsu Coralstone. Maybe I should've gone in that direction (I got a Shelter Harmony). I'm familiar with a good bit of the Ortofon MC lineup -- though not the Cadenza Black or A95, I've owned Windfeld MC, Jubilee, Cadenza Bronze, etc. Beautiful looking cartridge too; miles better than the bulbous Anna (which I've heard in a few other systems now).

I do think, as you've found, that the sound quality jump from $2K-ish cartridges to the $4K+ level is very striking, and very worthwhile. Ugh, on the Facebook LP/Turntables group, the disdain for $1K+ cartridges is palpable. Nice to see there are still some of us who find the yields worthwhile.
Thanks, Mulveling.  I definitely feel like my vinyl rig has been promoted to the big leagues.  I have been pleasantly surprised from the very beginning.  If someone has a compatible system, the A95 is more than worthy of serious consideration.
Just when I thought I would be happy with my Cadenza Black for a while...

Nice Review
Just when I thought I would be happy with my Cadenza Black for a while...

Nice Review


Thanks.  VPI has bought up quite a few A95s and is selling them at a significant discount, though I bought mine from another dealer.

I can't say how the Windfeld compares as I have never had it in my system.  I was preparing to 
Great review, I read with particular interest because of my somewhat similar experience.  I have a Prime:  Periphery ring, Eagle/Roadrunner, 2 arms, Dual pivot kits, Counter Intuitive, triple belts.  I also have a Cadenza Black and also wasn't looking to replace it, but was offered a screaming deal on either an A95 or a Per Winfeld.  I went with the Winfeld.  The A95 is a more spectacular cartridge, more forward in presentation, it has a lot of pizzaz and most people would hear the magic and prefer it.  The Winfeld is more neutral, almost boring, no pizzaz at all, almost stark and sterile by comparison.  People who like Wagner are definitely going to prefer an A95.  People who like Satie are more likely to go for the Winfeld.  Speakers will point toward one over the other for sure. I like small group jazz, solo piano, voice and bass (been listening to a lot of Sheila Jordan lately), quiet stuff, so you can understand my preference.  You pegged the sound of our Cadenza Black.  A fine cartridge and I enjoyed mine very much, but what are we going to do with them now?
The Windfeld was a LOT better than the Jubilee when I had them several years back (around the time the A90 came out, which is when my dealer sold off those prior carts). The Cadenza Black is just the newer Jubilee.

I’ve also had the Kontrapunkt "c" and have had 2 Cadenza Bronzes, of which the Cadenza Bronze is the newer Kontrapunkt "c". And in that case, I can’t say I prefer the newer Cadenza. The Kontra "c" was really nice. Warm and ballsy; a fantastic rock cartridge and just well-natured all around. Wish I held onto it.

I’ve heard the A90 and Anna, in systems different than mine, a number of times over the years. My impression is that they’re extremely clean and resolving sounding, like a super Windfeld. More refined and detailed, too. Especially the Anna. But all cut from the same cloth. They really blur the lines between high-end digital (I mean the good stuff, like great Esoteric rigs) and high-end analog. The Jubilee just sounded "different" than these to me -- a good cart to be sure, but just not playing at this very high level; very 2-dimensional, missing some extension, missing a lot of dynamics and bass impact, and missing a lot of resolving power.

So...not sure if that helps, lol. But if I were holding a Windfeld I wouldn’t ever consider a Black. An A95 might be a solid upgrade (or even much more), though.

The new Windfeld Ti and A95 both look extremely interesting, to be honest.

@billstevenson 

Thanks.  Our respective vinyl setups are almost identical except you have the Prime while I have the Classic 3, and I don't have the dual pivot assembly.  I did try it but preferred the setup without it.  I also only have one tonearm, but I might get a second to mount something like a Kiseki or Transfiguration on it.

I built my overall setup to play a variety of music, but it is best voiced as the 2nd or 3rd table from the stage of a small but lively jazz club.  I agree that A95 is not the best choice if you want a mellower presentation, which I sometimes prefer myself, hence the idea of getting a second tonearm/cartridge combo.