For those that use an external DAC with node 2i


Please describe the shortcomings of the node2i dac, as well as what to specifically expect to hear as an improvement with a truly better (not just different and external dac). My node seems to have what I'd call a bit dark smoothed sound. Cymbals seem a bit faint, but trying another dac that presents a more forward louder cymbal seems to sound less recessed and smoothed; thereby exchanging a bit of dark(warm?) smooth depth for more forward brighter presence that is more forward enveloping but with less depth. It's weird, because depending upon the song one may sound better than the other. I'm not sure which sound is truly more accurate, or even which one I prefer consistently, but I would like to make a choice and start listening to my music instead of critically analysing each component back-and-forth. Perhaps I'm not using enough of a drastic improvement dac, but I'd like to figure that out too. I do realize a lot of what sounds better to one person is different than what another likes, but so far, I'm leaning towards the dac where the cymbals seem louder/brighter even though it's at the expense of what seems to me to maybe be a darker smoother (illusory lower noise floor?).
Also, I was unable to level match this comparison,  so that adds another variable. The external dac I compared to the node 2i was an old parasound zdac version 1. Perhaps if I sampled a higher end dac like a denafrips or an Ayre coda, etc. I'd see what direction was better for a reference point, but if anybody here has actually done their own evaluations, I'd welcome your input, experience and perspective. Thanks.
128x128labguy
I'm running a node 2i with a Benchmark DAC 2 HGC. Very happy with the overall improvement to Tidal and Qobuz. 
Why would anyone use optical when you are limited to 24/96?

SPDIF 75 ohm(sic) digital coax.will get you 24/192.

I was looking into the HiFi Rose 150 but you can't argue with the BS Node 2i price. And it would feed into my Classe SSP-800 DAC through digital coax.

Might have to strongly consider that option.
The Audiofool in youtube has comparisons of the Node 2 to Topping E30/D50s. He also has sound demos if you are into that thing, so you can view the Node 2 demo, and compare it to the toppings as well as Schiit Yggy and Chord Hugo 2.
I have a very different take on all this.  I have a Node2i which I have tried with the internal DAC and with external DACs.  I also tried the streamer/DAC combinations in the NAD M10 and M33.  I have tried Amazon HD, Idagio, Qobuz, Tidal and now finally Primephonic (via AirPlay).  Primephonic has made by far the biggest difference because they have so many recordings of various classical pieces.  For example, they have 567 recordings of Beethoven's 5th Symphony.  (This is not a typo.)  The differences in the performances are much greater than the differences across streamers/DACS.  The point is not that you should use Primephonic (it is almost exclusively classical) - or any other particular streaming service - but rather that the performance and the recording matter a lot more than the streamer/DAC. 
@jjss49 

the dac drives 80-90% of the nature of sq

So you agree that what comes before the DAC matters but are saying that a 10-20% difference in sound quality doesn't matter?