By 'whole room experience', I mean that the Vandersteen design concept is one of having a fairly wide dispersion pattern coming from each speaker. This results in a similar listening experience whether you are centered between the speakers or off to one side or the other. You can also be closer or further away from the speakers and changes will be a lot less dramatic than doing the same types of things with the Dunlavy design. It sounds like you are going to be doing a lot of things other than just sitting down to do what many of us call 'critical listening'. As such, I think you would be happier with the Vandersteen(s). I'm a big Dunlavy fan, but it doesn't sound like the SC-IVs match up too well with your application.
dunlavy sc4 vs. Vandersteen 4 speakers
Can anyone who has had experience with both these speakers please provide feedback on the differences sound and overall enjoyment of each of these speakers.
Keep in mind I'm speaking of the 1st model Dunlavy SC4's not the 4a's
And the Vandersteen model 4's(the ones with the dual 12inch woofers)not the Quattro's
Keep in mind I'm speaking of the 1st model Dunlavy SC4's not the 4a's
And the Vandersteen model 4's(the ones with the dual 12inch woofers)not the Quattro's
4 responses Add your response