@nymarty I would direct the funds towards a purchase of a new amp and noy have the old DNA modded.
@soix looks like you’ve taken on a function of being a proxy for SMc Audio to deliver a message of vested interest. No one can possibly predict when the amplifier is going to fail and I don’t recall reading much about these amps becoming boat anchors all of a sudden.
I’ve owned DNA-0.5, DNA-125 (a good step up over the original 0.5) and the DNA-225 (amazing amplifier, one of my favorites in its stock form even to this day) that I decided to send in for a Gold revision which was a big mistake. The sonic signature changes that occurred with the revision made the amplifier pretty much go from a jaw dropping performance to being unlistenable in my system. And yes I gave it all the break in it needed. This was back in 2006 and around the time I sold that amp the revised McCormack amps would pop up on the market quiet frequently. I also saw “my” DNA-225 come up on audiogon classifieds at least 3 times (could be more but I as well as my audio buddies just stopped paying attention to McCormack amps).