Manufacturers only matter to me to the extent that there are certain expectations of quality levels based on a manufacturer's track record. I don't expect mediocre sound from ARC, Herron Audio or VPI nor do I expect that high level of performance from brands that have not attained anything near that in the past. IMO, it's a matter of setting standards and the target market segment for each manufacturer.
Does mfg's name/model affect your opinion of sound
Many years ago a local audio store (RIP) demoed several tube amps & pre-amps. Some were McIntosh, some were Audio Research, etc. all high end and expensive.
I couldn't help but think that the McIntosh to be "better" sounding than the others since it had the highest price tag and the sexiest front panel design (compare them with their original front panel: ugly!).
I naively assumed the reason they are so expensive is because they must sound better.
Having over 40 years of tube experience, I now judge them purely on the merits of sound as I perceive it.
Does the brand name and price of equipment influences your hearing judgement and buying decision?
Eg: more expensive, therefore must be better.
How many of us have the luxury of listening to a blind test and just hear the music without knowing who made the equipment?
I couldn't help but think that the McIntosh to be "better" sounding than the others since it had the highest price tag and the sexiest front panel design (compare them with their original front panel: ugly!).
I naively assumed the reason they are so expensive is because they must sound better.
Having over 40 years of tube experience, I now judge them purely on the merits of sound as I perceive it.
Does the brand name and price of equipment influences your hearing judgement and buying decision?
Eg: more expensive, therefore must be better.
How many of us have the luxury of listening to a blind test and just hear the music without knowing who made the equipment?