Diminishing Returns


I know the point of diminishing returns is different for everyone, probably dependent on their inclme, how much importance they place on the stereo, and to exactly what sound they will be happy with.

In these times (not pandemic but rather trickle down tech) where I feel like you are able to get more for your money, what price point do you feel you need to be at to achieve audio nirvana?

I was researching the absolute least expensive speakers and found that the Elac Debut 2.0 B6.2, the Wharfedale Diamond 225, Triangle Borea BR03 are a few that get excellent reviews and can be had for around $500 or less and it got me thinking...

At $1000 the Whatfedale Evo 4.2 looks very compelling (I loved the Evo 4.4 at RMAF last year)...

At $2000 there seems to be some seriously stiff completion...

Just a fun discussion regarding what you think are outstanding deals sound wise, what the speakers are and how much they cost.  No “well such is $10,000 and it competes with $100,000 speakers”.  I’m talking for the average person who isn’t making $100,000 a year.  I’m talking $5,000 or less, less is better, much better.  I understand that for some, $5,000 speakers are like $500 speakers to others, no need to point out the obvious.

What I do want to know is speakers that you feel punch waaay above their price point and at what price (the lower The better) you feel like diminishing returns comes into play.  Also, lets try not to make this a Tekton DI conversation because it looks like they are the answer to this question at $3500; lets get some others in here that we may not know about.

If this thread sounds dumb to you, sorry, and just move on please!

Another one in question for me would be the SB Acoustics Satori Ara kit...
128x128b_limo

Showing 1 response by audioguy85

Never mind the wharfedale 4.2’s....save your money and grab a pair of the wharfedale diamond 225’s (usually $449) now only $299 at music direct!. They won both the Stereophile and Absolute Sound product of the year award a few years back and are still available. I own them and they punch way above their price, as you say...the midrange will be better than the 4.2’s. Read the part time audiophile review on the 4.2’s....he mentioned some things concerning the midrange, which I did not like. The bass on the 225 will be better as well. Stereophile found there to be measurable output at 31.5 HZ! Granted down in DB from the rated 40 HZ...but amazing non the less. I like the 225 so much I have a pair in reserve for when they no longer make them. Right now they are put away, as I’m enjoying my Tannoys....herb Reichert liked the 225’s better than his ls50’s, the elac B6, and even his falcons!

"The Diamond 225 had a pacey, easy-flowing transparency that made my KEF LS50s sound slightly thick, my Technics SB-C700s sound slightly dry, my Falcon Acoustics LS3/5as sound a mite bright. I was hoping I wouldn’t have to say those things, but that’s what I heard."
Some of the stuffy jerks here can laugh all they want and balk at a pair of 449 dollar speakers all they want, I can care less! I hear what I hear and can see why these speakers are so special!

https://www.musicdirect.com/speakers/wharfedale-diamond-225-bookshelf-speakers