DEXA D-Clock or Neutron Star?

I just got the Dexa, a lot problem trying to install to the Marantz SA11. Improvements: front to back layering is better, complex loud message do not collapse soundstage anymore, less digital sounding, image is a bit more solid and bass a bit more defined, timbre a bit more natural, worth while upgrade.

Adlpc... The project got pushed in a manner of priority and that I'm about to be out of the country for almost a year. It will be going for the reclock once I return. Wish I had something to report on but I will certainly post back to this thread when it does finally happen. Sadly, the dac, two months old is now sitting in storage. :-( Along with the rest of my system.
Dgarretson, I figured the bigger the better so I'm going with their reference model. Thanks for the tip on the ps. Should have been the first thing I thought of! :-)

Thanks for the responses. Will post when I get it finished.

I have not tried either, but have two second-hand reports that the Neutron Star is excellent. With several Audiocom generations to SC4 I found that results are all about the quality of the power source. Get the best clock & PS that you can afford.

Apparently not too many people interested in re-clocking a dac! I am looking at a Behringer DCX2496 and there is a lot of talk about upgrading to a DEXA reference clock to reduce jitter. Many claim a major increase in transparency and timber accuracy.
Interested to know how your project progressed and if you observed any major improvements.

Guess not. Well I'm doing it anyway.

Follow on question here. Is there a benefit to reclocking the transport too? Since the signal winds up getting reclocked at the dac
anyway, does it make a difference?