DeVore O/93 or PureAudioProject Duet15 for a First Watt SIT-3?


Hi
What do you think would be better for a warm organic late night listening (classic music, opera and jazz)?
Stereophile reviewed the O/93 as a perfect pairing with SIT-3 (even is SIT-3 prefers low impedance speakers).
Duet15 seems to me more sensible (97db vs 93db) (and Steve Guttenberg think are top).
My current speakers are 4ohms / 87db Avalon Indra, absolute fantastic at their 80db listening kingdom.

Thanks

128x128ulul

No dynamic speaker can reproduce transients like a capable horn system. If they could this would be the most significant reason to abandon horns altogether. In fact it is the far superior dynamic/transient capabilities of horn based speakers that prevent me from completely writing them off. 

The audio get togethers started before I became a dealer. In fact all the product that we carry is product that my partner and I owned previously or had vast exposure to. 

Suggesting the superiority of first order crossovers is nothing new, nor is the concept of time alignment. Most speakers I have owned over the years have been first order and I strongly prefer sealed enclosures although Atohm is ported.

Every dealer need an entry level turntable line. Rega has been wonderful to work with and fills this segment nicely. My personal table is the top of the line Merrill Williams with a Triplanar. I think M.W. now has a composite platter which I should investigate. 

@audition__audio 

Peace brother. I have been something of an ass and you have reacted like a gentleman. I apologize and will not say a negative word to you or about you if I can possibly help it. 

Friends, I feel like we've gone a little off topic....
In the end I would have decided not to get an OB but to replace the Indras with the Orangutans. 
The dilemma now is between the O/93 and the O/96 (apart from cost). Which ones are more suitable for nighttime low listening?

The dilemma now is between the O/93 and the O/96 (apart from cost). Which ones are more suitable for nighttime low listening?

The O/96's. But only by a slight margin. The names are derived from their respective claimed sensitivities though JA measured slightly lower figures. The O/96 has a higher performance woofer (more powerful magnet assembly). Over and above, the O/96 has a looser, more lively sound and the 0/93 is slightly buttoned-up by comparison. The O/96's are a bit more picky with room placement. 

For the money, I would get the O/93s. I think they are more cohesive and balanced. I noticed little to no difference in efficiency.

Fred, thanks for the comment. No problems on my end.