2. misc-audio
  3. 190651-166451

DCS Sending Legal Notice To Reviewer (Golden Sound) Over an Old Review of Their Bartok DAC

I saw this You Tube video which was posted by Headphones.com which at the beginning talked about the site taking the side of Golden Sound (GS) & then GS himself going through the details of what happened (his side of the story).

https://youtu.be/R7NxRFT6FiI

While I am not taking any sides until DCS comes out with their story publicly. While we all are aware that many times companies force reviewers to remove the criticism of their products by employing different ways. But what should be the way forward about the reviews for reviewers and companies?

Can we as the end consumers and as a community come-up with the framework around reviews?

 

Regards,

Audio_phool

128x128audio_phool
larsman's avatar
larsman
1,920 posts
 

@jimmyblues1959 + 1

@mahler123 + 1

rlb61
787 posts
 

@dogeardeaudio ... I was referring solely to an action or proceeding commenced in the United States.

plaw
85 posts
 

I was thinking about a DCS - but I wouldn't touch it after this.

 

audio_phool's avatar
audio_phool OP
85 posts
 

Now all the drama has ended, dCS has released their statement apologizing for the entire fiasco.

https://dcs.community/t/goldensound-headphones-com-dcs-an-update/6740

Regards,

Audio_phool

viridian's avatar
viridian
5,010 posts
 

David Steven admits to lieing in his first statement, is lieing in the second statement when he says "...we are not that kind of company..." when everything, including his mea culpa, proves that they are exactly that kind of company.

It takes a decades to create a successful company and only a few key strokes to destroy it. Shame on you David Steven.

More to discover