Conversion to DSD: Does It Eliminate Digital Glare?
Hi All
This question is for people that have gear capable of converting vanilla redbook pcm CD files in to DSD. To my knowledge this would include the Sony HAP ES and certain DACs, such as one that I am interested in, the Mytec Manhatten. I currently have two highly resolving CD Players, the Oppo 105 and the Denon "Anniversary Edition" SACD/CD player. I listen to Classical Music about 99.9% of the time. Rest of the system is Parasound PreAmp JC-1 and Power Amp A-21 with B&W 803- Diamond speakers; Bluesound Vault-2 and Node-2; and a MacBook Air via Thunderbolt/Firewire adapter into a 10 year old Apogee firewire dac. My complaint is that some CDs, particularly in full Orchestral passages, tend to harden, particularly the strings. My SACDs (I have over 100) don't do that, and I tend to attribute this to the DSD used in SACDs. I am therefore interested if converting vanilla rebook CDs to DSD tends to eliminate this problem.
So, what exactly do you mean by conversion? A numer of DAC's since the early days have been single, PWM at the back end and yeah, lots of those had glare anyway. :)
@mahler123 nails it. I have the Brooklyn. There’s no glare in any format. They all sound good.
What I did noticed with my previous dac is that a Remedy Reclocker improved the top octave resolution. The RR re-clocks everything to 96/24. After auditioning both DAC’s I’ve come to the conclusion that some DAC’s play high rez much better than low rez.
For a long time we have assumed that High rez music sounds better because of the data in the files. Now I wonder if it wasn’t really that DAC’s have underperformed with Redbook. It’s not quite the same thing. The new generation of DAC’s has really closed the gap between Redbook and High rez.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.