It's good advice. The amp 3 is not for stereo, but only surround. I just happen to get it first because its a good deal, and HT will not get a significant portion of money and I feel the amp 3 will give me want I need and will drive any surround speakers.
That being said, I was pretty sold on the ML 27.5, 331, 334, and felt they would drive any speaker in my final list of choices. Now with the 802's I still feel they will be a excellent match. I've heard the combo ML-BW plenty (used to sell them), but the classe monoblocks just came to my attention. I've not compared the two, so its imposible to tell.
What I did like is first the idea that I can affort monoblocks (big grin), they did certainly drive the 802's to sound pressure levels I was happy with, no matter the mood (like live pink floyd sound levels).
So now I ask the question, anybody have the chance to compare the classe mono blocks (cam 200) with ML stereo amp? Looking for ultimate detail, transparency, imaging and soundstage. Very high volume levels a very distant factor, and not at the expense of the above characters.
Michel
That being said, I was pretty sold on the ML 27.5, 331, 334, and felt they would drive any speaker in my final list of choices. Now with the 802's I still feel they will be a excellent match. I've heard the combo ML-BW plenty (used to sell them), but the classe monoblocks just came to my attention. I've not compared the two, so its imposible to tell.
What I did like is first the idea that I can affort monoblocks (big grin), they did certainly drive the 802's to sound pressure levels I was happy with, no matter the mood (like live pink floyd sound levels).
So now I ask the question, anybody have the chance to compare the classe mono blocks (cam 200) with ML stereo amp? Looking for ultimate detail, transparency, imaging and soundstage. Very high volume levels a very distant factor, and not at the expense of the above characters.
Michel