Tough question. Going active is a huge improvement. A single amp would have to be exceptional relative to the other amp in order to even be in the same ball park as an active set up. However, the Klout was a very good amp relative to the LK 140. If I had to make a call, I think I would go with the active set up. What tilts my judgement is the statement that you listen to all lot of classical music. Classical is very dynamic music and, in complex orchestral passages, would demand a system that is capable of resolving the different instruments playing contemporaneously. These are exactly the characteristics that an active system would most likely produce. Your apparent amplifier power will increase by about ten fold which would improve dynamics. And the decrease in intermodulation distortion and precise separation of the frequencies from the active crossover should result in better detail and resolution of the multiple instruments playing together.
However, I have to admit that these are theoretical speculations on my part. I use an active Linn set up too, but I haven't heard the exact comparison you want to make.
I shall read any other comments from other posters with interest, being a Linn junkie myself.
However, I have to admit that these are theoretical speculations on my part. I use an active Linn set up too, but I haven't heard the exact comparison you want to make.
I shall read any other comments from other posters with interest, being a Linn junkie myself.