2. amps-preamps
  3. 1072882851

Bryston 4B-SST vs. 6B-SST

Within the next month or so I plan on upgrading my two channel amp, currently a 4B-ST. You can see from my "system" link that I have a home theatre setup, but, I primarily listen to 2 channel.

I currently have the 4B-ST on the front two channels and a Rotel RMB-1075 (5x120) bi-amping the center and a single channel to each rear. This of course leaves one channel unused.

I like the way the 4B-ST sounds, I really like how Pass Labs (X250) sounds but, budget limitations have nipped that in the bud, sigh. I do like the newer Bryston SST's a lot as well, and they are affordable to boot.

I have been able to audition a 4B-SST but not a 6B-SST. The specs are the same except for the 6B being 3 channels instead of 2. They do look different internally. The 6B looks modular while the 4B does not. It would work well if I could use the 6B-SST for the fronts and center and swap my current 4B-ST to the rears.

Has anyone compared these amps sound qualities, especially with 2 channel?

Do you think, or know, of any reason that would make the 3 channel amp perform less suitably in a 2channel situation?

Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
distortion

Showing 3 responses by distortion

distortion OP
571 posts
 
My thoughts were, that the modular design of the 6B-SST may limit its abilities in comparison to the 4B-SST. I presume they have similar sonic characteristics, but since I have never heard the 6B-SST I thought it would be better to ask.
distortion OP
571 posts
 
I havent made a decision yet. Logic is pushing me towards the two-channel amp. The foundation of my logic is, since most of my listening is two channel, a two channel amp will be the most efficient means to effect change now and down the road. I know I cant afford a big Pass right now, but I can wait and save. If I lock myself in with a three or more channel amp, then future amp changes will become more costly and technically more difficult. I suppose a modular approach to system building is what you can call it.

The caveat is, that the center channel amplification will probably be different than the L/R fronts. That is what was pushing me towards the 3 channel configuration in the first place.

I am glad you guys brought up the Theta. FWIW I have read at least a few comments on how great the Theta sounds. I am going to look into that possibility. In all honesty though, my mind keeps drifting back to how good that Pass X250 sounded. I wonder If the Pass has good synergy with the Bryston Processor (SP-1.7).
distortion OP
571 posts
 
For an update, I decided on the 4BSST. I made a few offers on used Pass X250s but no takers. The Pass is so deep, physically, that a new rack would be necessary. Surprisingly the SST isnt killed by the Pass, in fact its a pretty close race.

I decided to go with a 2 channel and a 5 channel Amp. The 2 for the stereo mains and the 5 for center and surrounds. I can biamp the center, run the two surrounds, and still have one channel left over for the rear center (6.1 setup). Plus I want the 2 channel path discrete for future upgrades.

All this is helped along by my loss of enthusiasm for multi channel hi-rez. I dont have, nor have heard, a single hi-rez disc in which I preferred multi channel over two channel. In fact, my modest Jolida CDP usually sounds better with the hybrid layer! Maybe that will change when funds become available for a source upgrade. Though redbook will be my main focus.

Secondarily I want to have some Vinyl experiments, which has my Wife all excited, BTW. When she figures out what that really means I'll probably have to take her shoe shopping or something.
More to discover