Avid acustus reference vs TW acustic raven AC3

I described the PC1 vs ultraeminent under my system post. It is at the end. Hope this help you.

I have heard good things about the UltraEminent BC. Can you tell us some more. I have owned the original MSL Eminent & the PC1 which would be a wonderful reference point if you have owned them.

I posted a summary of what I thought of the carts under my system thread. Never tried the Breuer/Allaert myself.

Hi, I would be very interested by your experience on the cartridges you mentioned bacause they are representing a broad range of options available for hi-end cartridges. I live in the Netherlands so your positive feedback regarding Breuer/allaerts combo is promising. What about the xv1T, PC1, Coralstone, ultraeminent, titan i? What are their respective merits?

I have the Phantom 2, triplanar 7 and davinci. Carts owned include xv1T, PC1, Coralstone, ultraeminent, titan i; brief experience with PC1 supreme.

Davinci floats the soundstage best with more airy presentation. My favourite is ultraeminent BC from my sonic lab. Coralstone is a close second. PC1 is not bad if you can tolerate not having the most detailed presentation. Supreme is not worth the extra money for me.

No exp. with Breuer.

Jadis is very good gear. Used to have a 88S.

If you go with the TW AC3 and Breuer, try an Allaerts cart. A couple of friends that I know run the Breuer with it and prefer it to the Xv-1s in that arm.

thanks for your feedback, actually I have Jadis gear, JPS3 as phono preamp, JPS2 as line preamps and JA200 monoblock poweramps, with maggies 3.5. Which tonearm cartridges combinations would you recommend with the AC or AC3? I was thinking of a Breuer tonearm 10.5 inches with dynavector XV-1s or air tight PC1 or koetsu rosewood platinum but I am not sure yet. What would be best to have wide soundstage and airy highs like with the acutus?

Footfall issue was related to contruction of the house. Major problem with 70+yr old house I was in. In my currenly 12 yr old house, it is less of an issue.

I have an Acutus (ordering a new Acutus Reference these days) and find it difficult to understanding your problem with footfall. I have a suspended wood floor as well and have never had any problems crossing the floor, even if I can see the turntable move up and down when I step on the floor.

The platter should be parallell to the arm, but the older players had a higher "base" of the center spindel. I bought a new spindel for my turntable and the new one doesn't "bend" the LP as much, helping the LP stay parallell to the arm. (Sorry for my english).

I have owned the Acutus with new motor (not Ref) and Raven AC1. Not exact model you are asking but similar.

Acutus: More detailed and airy presentation. I had severe footfall issues with suspended wood floor. I need to sneak around like a ninja to avoid skipping. Even though it can accomodate different arms, the platter tilt to the arm side and if arm is heavier than SME 5 and the converse is true. You can spend a lot of time dialing in a precise setup but when the springs are set into motion, I have some doubts whether the setup is preserved. The manual says don't obsess with setup and you have to be happy with that philosophy.

AC1: The quantity of bass was not more than Acutus which surpised me, The texture of bass is better and midrange is harmonically richer. Very easy to setup and immune to footfall. Accomodate multiple arms so this does it for me. Table does not have topend air like the Acutus.

The Acutus is like an OTL amp and AC1 is like a Jadis.