I agree th Wilson's demand power mine run on 1.2 kw mac for the wilson max.even though they avertise you can run a low wattage tube amp.also if you want base get a big woofer.even though smaller 7 inch 8 inch are faster due to less mass on the cone they have a hard time moving alot of air.amps cabels have to match impedance and inductance of speakers.thats why some get more synergistic than others.enjoy the search and expirements find the sound you like.
Auditioned Wilson Sabrina X vs B&W 803D4 and Shocked
I recently auditioned the Wilsons vs. B&Ws and am a little befuddled. I had money in hand and was ready to purchase the Wilsons, but after reading the stellar reviews of the Sabrina Xs, I didn't think anything could compare in that price range. The source equipment was the McIntosh MC611s and the MC12000, which closely replicated my equipment.
It was not even a close comparison; the B&Ws were clearly better in every aspect. The midrange was glorious, the highs were crisp, and the bass filled the room. The Wilsons were anemic with bass (roughly 14'x16'). The midrange was clinical, and the highs were nothing to write home about. I'm perplexed because Sabrina's bass output (per the reviews) belies its driver size. We even experimented with the 4 and 8-ohm outputs on the Macs.
Has anyone experienced something similar, or am I missing something (synergy, cabling, etc.)? I really wanted to love the Wilsons, but at $20K, I am not impressed. I know the B&Ws are $5K more, but I heard that Wilson is doing a price increase for 2025, which will level the price gap. I would love to hear about some experiences involving both brands or the discrepancies I heard in the presentations.
- ...
- 26 posts total
- 26 posts total