Audiophiles should learn from people who created audio


The post linked below should be a mandatory reading for all those audiophiles who spend obscene amounts of money on wires. Can such audiophiles handle the truth?

http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wire.htm

defiantboomerang

Showing 2 responses by cleeds

defiantboomerang
According to the Cambridge dictionary, you are quite wrong. This is what they have to say about "should".

"We use should most commonly to talk about what is the ideal or best thing to do in a situation."

And below is the link to the relevant page. You should follow it.

You’re being selective with your quotation, which is no surprise coming from you. Here’s Merriam Webster:

Definition of should 1 —used in auxiliary function to express condition
  • if he should leave his father, his father would die
  • —Genesis 44:22 (Revised Standard Version)
2 —used in auxiliary function to express obligation, propriety, or expediency
  • ’tis commanded I should do so
  • —William Shakespeare
  • this is as it should be
  • —H. L. Savage
  • you should brush your teeth after each meal

But the key question remains: can cablephiles handle the truth?

Now you’re just being silly. Again, your name "defiantboomerang" pretty much says it all.




defiantboomerang

The post linked below should be a mandatory reading ...

It’s one thing to suggest that readers here do something. It’s another to be told we "should" do something. Who are you to declare what is "mandatory?"

"Defiantboomerang." Your name says it all.