It's the same for car reviews. The reviewer practically falls over himself, doting on the car's attributes only to take exception to it a year later when comparing to the newer version, bringing up 'obvious' faults of the older one.
One must take note that these deficiencies would be apparent upon a first sample and yet they never make it into the initial findings.
One must take note that these deficiencies would be apparent upon a first sample and yet they never make it into the initial findings.