Audiophile demographics?


Why are there a disproportional number of male audiophiles?
Not sure if this is a silly question, but speaking for myself, I have never met a female audiophile.
I am sure they exist, but their scarcity begs the question as to why.
Is it merely that men have more of the "mine is bigger than yours" mentality, do men love gadgets and tools or is it something more sinister?
tony1954

Showing 5 responses by hilde45

@djone51 Fascinating article, djones. Thanks. This is a complex issue, and for reasons sketched in the article, not always easy for the lover of technology to get fully clear on due to the myopia inherent to any strong attachment, including technophilia.

I tend to think of technology much more broadly -- as ways of accomplishing tasks or experiencing states of mind/body. And technologies can be very simple. Most primitive, perhaps, is a simple technique: "How to open a pickle jar," for example -- is a technology. Next, we might think of simple tools; a hammer is a technology. And of course things get more complex from there.

If we agree that technologies can be as simple as techniques, then the gender "difference" becomes diluted. Even if one supposes women in their "typical" [please note the scare quotes] roles -- cooking, sewing, etc. -- there is deep involvement with technology. My daughter, for example, just came out of one of those wonderful restaurant supply stores raving about the variety of whisks they carried. She’s in love with the technology of the whisk because it will empower a wider range of techniques in her baking, for a wider range of purposes.

The question comes back, perhaps, to a more typical male love of technology that "disburdens" one -- that allows one to press a button and watch the machine deliver the end product. This, perhaps, is one source of the article’s reference to the atavistic love of power which men find in technology. The female whisk-lover wants to be empowered to do something (bake, e.g.) whereas the male device lover wants to make something magically appear -- like a wizard or god. Different ways of being in the world, no?

That said, there are many men on this forum who are more like bakers -- DIY’ers, electrically-versed, etc. They love the technology only fully once they understand it and perhaps engage with it. They make things, get their hands dirty, chat with other hobbyists. Like a sewing circle, no?

So, like most things, there’s a spectrum, and personality is a heterogenous mix of different traits, a collage not a solid color. Frankly, the more perspectives on this hobby, the better. What would be really interesting would be to see more women in charge of audio companies. What would change? What would it bring? 
@sokogear Interesting comment about only sound mattering to serious audiophiles. Would you say the same thing about food -- doesn't matter how it looks, only how it tastes? It seems that analogy should carry over. If it doesn't, I'm curious what you think the difference is.
djones Good point. One picks up a whisk, imagines it as an extension of their arm and hand. Problem with audio technology is that it is never really possibly an extension of our own capabilities. It's job is to present things TO us. Possibly another relevant dimension (cf. "ready to hand" vs. "present to hand" in Heidegger).
@sokogear

How appetizing a food looks can make you think it will taste better, which actually makes it so.

This comment gave me something to think about. The discrimination we make between our senses are conceptual labels we use for practical purposes, but the interaction of different senses is a real phenomenon, as you point out! Maybe this is partly evolution -- the ability to survive depends on knowing when food "looks bad to eat."

a thrown together plate of food is not as appetizing as a neat one or a carefully constructed one at a restaurant

I completely agree, not least because I can see -- and anticipate -- the flavors to come better when it’s not a pile of mush. And anticipation is a big component of the later experience.

I suppose that’s where the analogy breaks down. One cannot really anticipate what something will sound like based on how the equipment looks, right? Although, I have to say when i look at some of those big horn speakers -- or the array of drivers on the Tektons -- part of me starts to anticipate *something* sonic.
@sokogear -- when I close my eyes, the music sounds more intense for sure, and the food does as well. Is there something to be gained, experientially, in having a combinatory experience with, say both sight+taste? Or to put it in more organic terms (from a male hetero point of view) it's how she looks-and-smells that combine to make her my lovely one.

I think this is a dividing point for some when it comes to the aesthetics of many things -- namely, that there's either a combinatory effect in the initial experience which includes more than one sense OR there's an overall experience that is overall better with both.