Attention: Debussy-loving audiophiles

Frankly , sound quality depends more on the acoustics of the recording site and the talents of the recording/mixing engineers than any of that stuff.  There are outstanding recordings at 16/44.1 and grim ones at 24/192.  That said, higher resolution does have real, but marginal, advantages.  Multichannel is also significant, IMHO.

It depends on the quality of the recording more than the sample rate and how it arrived at that sample rate. The more we try different gear the more it becomes apparent that some dacs sound better at certain sample rate settings because, quite frankly, many of them mishandle the data stream and sometimes do so less severely at different settings. In short, just because a 24/48 sounds better on a particular dac than the 16/44.1 version may NOT be because of the sample rate of the recording, it may be because certain dacs dont handle it as effectively.

24/48 usually doesn’t cut it for me.  Btw, mentioning the name of the Conductor might have been a nice touch 

In a brief sampling, I found it unremarkable.  Not bad but not notable.

I will have time later to listen more extensively.

https://open.qobuz.com/album/xstvhd9qt0xja

Link?