"The downside to low level listening to accurate speakers is a lack of bass."
I respectfully disagree. I suppose you've auditioned all the "accurate" speakers available today. Just because good active speakers, made by folks that also serve the recording industry (pro audio) have much greater dynamic range potential than most conventional speakers does not mean that they all are lacking at low listening levels.
It seems to me that the definition of high-end audio is the most accurate reproduction of the source at least it was at the beginning. Of course that reveals any issues upstream. Rather than addressing these issues, the speaker is blamed for being "too accurate".
So many spend lots of money on less than accurate speakers with anomalies to suit their taste. Low cost, distortion generators can do the same for far less money.
If your taste is less accurate, euphonically colored sound, nothing wrong with that. My argument would be, you don't have to spend a lot of money to achieve that, really a fraction of what a highly accurate system that excels in tonal correctness, presence and unrestricted dynamics would cost.
When you have this problem with "accurate speakers", the most likely cause is a poor amplifier speaker match and/or improper speaker/listening position set up.
Yes, I can see how the OP's speakers could sound the way he describes. But being intimately familiar with the current revision of this speaker, it's definitely not the fault of the speaker. If you have the original version, then yes, the tweeter was less than optimal and that is where a device like the Loki (very cost effective and well designed) may help. Personally I would prefer a Manley Massive Passive but that's like 100 times more expensive.
I respectfully disagree. I suppose you've auditioned all the "accurate" speakers available today. Just because good active speakers, made by folks that also serve the recording industry (pro audio) have much greater dynamic range potential than most conventional speakers does not mean that they all are lacking at low listening levels.
It seems to me that the definition of high-end audio is the most accurate reproduction of the source at least it was at the beginning. Of course that reveals any issues upstream. Rather than addressing these issues, the speaker is blamed for being "too accurate".
So many spend lots of money on less than accurate speakers with anomalies to suit their taste. Low cost, distortion generators can do the same for far less money.
If your taste is less accurate, euphonically colored sound, nothing wrong with that. My argument would be, you don't have to spend a lot of money to achieve that, really a fraction of what a highly accurate system that excels in tonal correctness, presence and unrestricted dynamics would cost.
When you have this problem with "accurate speakers", the most likely cause is a poor amplifier speaker match and/or improper speaker/listening position set up.
Yes, I can see how the OP's speakers could sound the way he describes. But being intimately familiar with the current revision of this speaker, it's definitely not the fault of the speaker. If you have the original version, then yes, the tweeter was less than optimal and that is where a device like the Loki (very cost effective and well designed) may help. Personally I would prefer a Manley Massive Passive but that's like 100 times more expensive.