Are audiophile products designed to initially impress then fatigue to make you upgrade?


If not why are many hardly using the systems they assembled, why are so many upgrading fairly new gear that’s fully working? Seems to me many are designed to impress reviewers, show-goers, short-term listeners, and on the sales floor but once in a home system, in the long run, they fatigue users fail to engage and make you feel something is missing so back you go with piles of cash.

128x128johnk

Showing 2 responses by waytoomuchstuff

This topic reminds me of the time my granddaughter asked: "Grampa, why do you spend so much time working on your old cars?"

Me: "Because I'm always fixing things that aren't broken."

@ghasley 

"reputable companies who build serviceable gear are the ones around for the long haul"

Very good point.  I found it interesting as my career/hobby in "consumer electronics" was winding down, just how many companies did not offer a service strategy whatsoever.  It takes a huge investment to offer a parts inventory, training, service literature, not to mention paying technicians to fix your mistakes.  Much more efficient to ship the customer a "B-stock" (refurbished) unit and credit them a "core charge" for their old one.  When they run out of "B-stock" pieces to fulfill service requrements, then the item become disposable.