And the biggest influence on sound quality is...


The quality of the recording itself.

Then the room, the setup, the speakers, and lastly the  front end.

I've got recordings that make my system sound horrible, and I've got recordings that make my system sound absolutely wonderful.

None of the gear changes have had that much impact on sound quality.

 

 

tomcarr

1. The room. A modest system in a great room can sound great whereas a great system in a bad room will sound worse - the wider you open the window, the more much flies in, as the saying goes.

2. The system - at the risk of repeating myself across various threads, systems are called systems for reason - it is the quality of the individual components but also how they do or don't work together as a system.

Recordings are what they are. A great system in a great room will make a bad recording listenable. A great recording on that system in that room will sound wonderful.

A great recording on a bad system in a bad room will sound "meh" at best.

 

Quality of the recording because it sets the ceiling. You can reach it or you might fall short of it, but you can’t exceed it

1. The room. A modest system in a great room can sound great whereas a great system in a bad room will sound worse - the wider you open the window, the more much flies in, as the saying goes.

2. The system - at the risk of repeating myself across various threads, systems are called systems for reason - it is the quality of the individual components but also how they do or don't work together as a system.

Recordings are what they are. A great system in a great room will make a bad recording listenable. A great recording on that system in that room will sound wonderful.

A great recording on a bad system in a bad room will sound "meh" at best.

 

It is the whole system which, of course, begins with the input and ends with the room. But like any chain every link matters. If any link fails the system fails. But in some ways the input could be thought of first. The rest of the system is basically set. Changing any part involves time, effort and money. A lousy source is easily replaced.

But let me throw out another thought. After over six decades of audiophilia I have come to believe the one characteristic of sound most important to sounding real is a system is dynamic linearity. And I don't mean the first thought of what usually comes to mind which is the ability to play loud cleanly. This is part of dynamic linearity. Dynamic linearity is the ability of the system to accurately, linearly, follow the source(which hopefully albeit too often isn't dynamically linear). It's the ability to make linear level changes whether the change is micro or mini or midi or macro. Think of a live, unamplified orchestra. Change your seat and the frequency response changes and yet it still is live. Or think about listening to acoustic music at the door outside the room. The sound is significantly affected and yet you know it's live sound. It's dynamic linearity.