Thank you for your comments! Everything in the editorial processes you describe is exactly as it should be, and that's comforting.
But I would like, if I may, to again direct your attention to Stereophile's infomercial review of the Ideon Absolute Stream Meta server-streamer by Jason Victor Serinus dated Oct 17, 2024.
Though Mr. Serinus appropriately uses quotation marks and properly attributes the most egregious nonsense to the manufacturer itself, he fails to exercise the most elementary level of critical thinking or due diligence, so that he allows false and / or impossible claims to proceed into his copy verbatim; and, apparently, Stereophile's editor and staff are happy to let it go to print.
You indicate that your copy is "run through the wringer", so why wasn't Mr. Serinus's? How can that even happen with the kind of editorial processes and controls you describe in your own organization? For sure Stereophile has similar, if not the very same editorial processes in place, so it would be interesting to learn how an advertorial-grade review can just circumvent that elaborate review process and go on to be published.