Analog Magic Question

The greatest thing about Analog Magik is the peace of mind I get when I am done. For years I sat listening and wondering if my cartridge was aligned. Now, even though there are too many variables to ever get it perfect, I am confident enough in my alignment that I can push those doubts away and my listening enjoyment has gone up tremendously. 

On a practical level, I agree with the above that VTA changes do not make tremendous differences, Never have and never will be the guy who changes VTA for every record depending on thickness. Life is too short. When in doubt I use the Fremer method with a USB microscope to make sure I am somewhere near 92 degrees and leave it there.  https://www.analogplanet.com/content/video-showing-setting-stylus-rake-angle-using-digital-usb-microscope

I do find the Azimuth adjustments to be very useful, very audible. I have version 1 and I use VTA test for Zenith. Typically after aligning by eye with a protractor I measure closer to 10 % distortion but with teeny tiny twist of the cartridge get it down to around 2%. No way to do that visually. Zenith and azimuth I see as the 2 things that make the most difference.

I suggest replacing the cheap ART interface he recommends with something better. I have found, as have others that the gain control on the ART does not track perfectly so adds difference in level between channels. There are many Pro Audio Interfaces to choose from. I have an Apogee Duet that works great, and the DAC also sounds very good so I use that when I want to stream.. not often.

https://www.sweetwater.com/shop/studio-recording/audio-interfaces/

I have not tried Wally, but with all of the + feedback it seems to be a fine way to do things. I have too many cartridges to be able to afford to send them all to Wally for analysis. Add all of the hardware you have to buy to implement his system and the cost of Analog Magik is a better option for me.

Here is the test summary.  Date of setup: July 26, 2025  

Turntable:  Technics SL1200GAE

Cartridge:  Ortofon 2M Black LVB

AnalogMagik V.2

Initial Setup was accomplished using mechanical & visual aids, i.e. Feickert protractor, Ortofon Stylus for gauge etc.

1. Speed.  33.3 (per discussion in the thread this was only used to verify that the program & hardware were working and adjusted properly.  It is agreed that this is not a valid test for the turntable.)

2. VTF.  I decided to use the 1.6 gram set point specified by Ortofon because there was no improvement in distortion levels when it was varied.

3. Antiskate.  Here again the setting provided by Technics worked as well as any so after fiddling with it, I decided to accept the factory adjustment.

4. Azimuth L to R. 0.03% difference (note my VTA adjuster is frozen but visually it looks OK)

5. Zenith Angle Error. 1.01%

6. Channel Balance. 0.01 db

7. Vibration.  Negligible. 

8. Resonance.  Failed.  >20db in both lateral and vertical planes.  This surprises me because in theory this bumble bee shouldn’t fly.  In fact this turntable has never sounded this good.  So much for theory. 

In closing I want to thank all of you for your questions and comments.  This dialog has been tremendously helpful to me as I have learned how to work with AnalogMagik.  If any of you are ever in South Florida and you want to bring along your turntable I would be delighted to meet you and setup your turntable using it.

@billstevenson 

I have set up four cartridges using the Analog Magik software, and all four should be ideal using the standard resonance calculation, based on weight of tonearm and  cartridge compliance; however, all four fail markedly using the Analog Magik test LP.  This makes me wonder how valid the test LP really is…

My VPI HW 40 w/Hyperion passed the test.  I was laughing to myself thinking about this last night.  First, no wonder my Technics sounds the best it has ever done.  It has a brand new LVB installed, which is far better than the regular Black that it replaced which was also defective in any event.  Also, like you, I wonder now how important the resonance test is.  Or put another way, what are the practical ramifications of this failure?  I thought it might be interesting to ask Ortofon for comment.  I have been interested in their new tonearm anyway and wonder if replacing the stock Technics tonearm would offer an appreciable improvement on the GAE.  In theory it should if the effective mass is low enough to render the resonance frequency of the combination using an LVB is in the 8-12 db range in both planes.

@drbond 

After ruminating per our last exchange I decided to ask Louis at Ortofon for comment.  I sent him a copy of my test report. He expressed alarm at the resonance result and asked if I was using an aftermarket head shell (yes a Jico) because in his experience the 2M cartridges are compatible w/SL1200 TTs.  He stated that the measured resonance failure would result in miss tracking and audible distortion.  So, I played through my Ortofon Test Record paying particular attention to the Tracking ability tracks and can hear no miss tracking.  My conclusion parallels yours that the deficiency must be in the AnalogMagik test for this parameter.