Or you could just keep them all a few inches apart, and at 90 when this isn't possible.
There. Now THAT was a pretty easy read!😂
@millercarbon - if you want to scrape the last vestige of hum out of your system, you will need to do a LOT more than "keep them all a few inches apart." You do need to read the paper if you think that is all there is to it. |
Not really. I scanned enough to realize nothing new. I also realize there's people do nothing but post glib uninformed comments. Mine is glib, but informed. I know there is more to it. But if you want to help people without taking up a whole afternoon boring them to tears with techno jargon, route wires a few inches apart and at right angles when space isn't possible. |
Was there something to read, in the original post? Didn’t show up, here. At any rate: if one considers the low voltages/currents we’re dealing with, as regards the typical system’s interconnects; the Inverse Square Law works nicely, with a few inches distance, when faced with parallel runs. AC cables and interconnects (particularly so, if unbalanced) may prove another story; especially, if the interconnect feeds a higher gain circuit (ie: phono). Crossing cables of any kind, at 90 degrees, is sometimes the only option and will typically avoid induced currents. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Forces/isq.html https://www.thepodcasthost.com/equipment/cable-crossing-bad-thing/# |
@millercarbon - right, but if you want to get your hum levels down to below 70 -75 dB, you will need to do more than just set wires a few inches apart. Your comment is not informed, it is just biased, and incomplete. @rodman99999 - Apparently, the original posting link and paper was deleted for some reason. Unfortunately, MS Edge didn't think the link was important, so it dumped it along with a number of other informative links. Regarding the spacing and 90 degree crossing, all I can say is, when I put a voltmeter on my system and fought to get hum and hum related noise below -70 dB, it took an entire 3 day weekend. I found that I needed dual ferrites on the less expensive wall warts that were several feet away from the phone inputs and my big Marantz Class D amp had to be two horizontal feet away from the Stax Headphone amplifier. I discovered any low level hum at all dissolves clarity and definition, even at louder volumes, so the long effort was well worth it. |
"I discovered any low level hum at all dissolves clarity and definition, even at louder volumes*, so the long effort was well worth it." *I couldn’t agree more. If I'm not mistaken: the better Stax headphones/amps work at much higher voltage levels than most, which could (possibly) account for the distances necessary, from your other components. KUDOS, for persevering and lowering your noise floor!
|
@rodman99999 I believe you are right. I seem to remember it had a 100Vrms output or something like that when I bought the unit. The Stax chassis is aluminum, so magnetic lines will pass right through it. I thought about covering the inside of the chassis with conductive copper tape to make a shorting ring but since moving the Marantz fixed the problem, I'll leave it as is. Thanks for the comments! |
You're welcome. Regarding the Stax pieces: I was thinking about the bias and signal voltages, that some of their amps supply to the electrostatic phones (little current/big voltages, relatively speaking). ie: https://staxaudio.com/technology Happy listening!
|