Amp/Preamps vs. High end AV Receivers


Hi,
I am sure this topic had been discussed exhaustively. I am new to this arena looking for some help to upgrade my Onkyo AV Receiver (135 w/channel). I am debating whether to the AV route or the AMP/Preamp combo. Naturally, I understand that I get what I pay for.

Would appreciate some inputs and suggestions regarding:
1. AMP/PREAMP combo route - 
2. AV route

I am not looking at a huge budget but a decent one. 

Thanks in advance
terrancej

Showing 1 response by audioman58

Integrated Amplifiers are another story ,seperate almost allways are better 
do to separation of RF, and noise , and bigger power supplies and capacitance .
that being said .my brother has the latest Gryphon Diablo ,and it is almost 85 lbs 
and Everything Premium ,and I am into system modding it is a work of art 
and will compete with ease Any seperates in the $20k plus range .
an integrated can have advantages if properly implemented such as no extra cables ,losses in signal there direct wiring and coupled  can have its own synergy 
with amp preamp in one package .$17k is not cheap and their $4k digital module 
is Excellent . If he ever sells it .i will take it Off his hands . I have the Very good Danish Gato 400-S Digital integrated amp that I feel a true bargain at $6500
i  have spent a homes worth on Audio overthe years and owned a audio store 
in The U.K . I feel well implemented class A,AB, Digital ,and Vacuum Tube 
all have examples that are excellent . To date the Gryphon  integrated 
is the most musical integrated I have heard. Vitus  from Denmark another Great equally as good
hand built integrated, their top seperates are better stil  if youhave $40k and up 
I donot .  A McIntosh receiver is very respectable , Accuphase much better still.
we are speaking of High quality gear. Denon, onykyo is ok for a starter system 
Audiophile quality they are not.