""
your adc 26 thread.
All I am able to say is:
You are right!!!!
This is a very outstanding cartridge!! "
thank's for that.
R.
ADC 26 BEST PRITCHARD CARTRIDGE EVER? or BEST CARTRIDGE EVER?
Audiogon these days is like fake news sometimes. @adc-grace we need your clarification, because Grace deserve respect, do you own the original Grace F14 or LEVEL-2 models or you are comparing your $100-200 ADC 26 to F-9 with the stylus from F-14? The $400 F-9 is nowere near the $1400 F-14 cartridge. Which exact model F-14 stylus do you have on your F-9 cartridge? P.S. the OP is trying to sell his ADC 26 in another thread, so this is just the advertising with caps lock in title? I just don't get it. |
@nandric The mass of moving parts is obviously important because all cart producers try to reduce this mass .Lighter cantilever, micro ridge styli and low uitput coils with as little wire as possible are examples. This is actually the reason for the preference for low-output MC cartridges. However MI cartridges have the lowest moving mass of all cart kinds. Then why my Grado Signature XTZ (MI) is not the "best cartridge in the world" ? Why FR-7fz is so good being huge, superheavy low compliance monster ? And why some MM cartridges like Grace F14 and LEVEL-II or AT-ML180 are so good? |
Dear chakster, I don't believe that you can deduce your statements about ''best carts'' from my statement about ''moving mass''. Moving mass is a part of the total cart construction but an very important part. The fact that each designer try to reduce this mass is obvious (?) prove for this assumption. I am not familiar with other carts you mentioned but well with FR-fz and AT-180. I think that you confused ''moving mass'' by FR-7fz with its damper which is ''responsible'' for the compliance. Besides ''rubber damping'' is not part of the moving parts . The output by FR-7fz is ''only'' 0,2 mV and means little wire for the coils which means reduction of mass. In your opinion the AT 180 is the ''best there is'' but this is not the case by other opinions. As you know I prefer MC kinds above any MM kind. So, in some sense, my opinion about MM kinds is not relevant for ''MM lovers''. |
@chakster Thank you very much. You are right, I love ADC and Grace, but sadly I didn´t get hold of the F-14 and Level II yet. The AsaKura´s One I didn´t know yet. But it is an MC. I like MM/MI more due to their more fluid sound. Like from one piece. Back to the ADC25/26 My next step will be to get a better stylus in the stylus holder. Something like LineContact or MicroRidge. Really interested how the sound will change. |
Dear @adc-grace : Mi take and next move with one of my ADC samples is like you, I will change cantilever/stylus for boron/ Line contact or Shibata one. The ADC 25/26/27 cartridge motor is just unique and Pritchard induced magnet design is way superior to MM designs. There are some really good MM cartridge performers but induced magnet/moving iron/moving flux ( that's a moving iron " refined ". ) as those ADC or Empire 4000D3 and some others that makes a little better " job ". Obviously that the room/audio system quality level performance has " to much to say " because synergy could change system to system starting with the tonearm where cartridges are seated. Analog never is " to easy " and with fixed rules. Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R. |
Dear Raul, you are right. You always have to test and test and test......... With really good cartridges every small change effects the sound. It will sound different in every system, turntable, tonearm, phono-pre etc. But once you have found good setups it is much easier with other cartridges. You get experience which changed could have a positive effect. The more experience you have the easier and faster you will get good effects. But the detail is it. Even if I look at my Grace f-9 systems (have 2 original and 2 retiped styli) everyone is different. Different tonearm etc. But everybody who one a light mass tonearm which is none unipivot (I did not the best experiences) should try an ADC 25/26/27 Regards M. |
@adc-grace Forgive me if i asked before, but i'm curious, have you tried the ADC TRX-2 (Sapphire Cantilever / Vital Diamond) in comparison to your different ADC models ? |
@chakster I only have a TRX 1. Bought it 2 years ago. But did only a short test for function. It is a little bit different. Was not bad at all but not the right tonearm. Will be the next system I will try on my ADC LMF-2 arm (nothing sophisticated, but light and good with different high compilance cartridges). Perhaps I have time this evening. But I will report to you about it. Regards |
Dear chakster, ''the best ever'' is a way of speaking. Like metaphors. One woud need to know how all cartridges ever produced sounds in order to make such statement. What we and you do is rather this: ''from all carts that I own I like ''x'' the best. I own TRX 2 in both versions; with sapphire and beryllium cantilever. The later is slightly better. I also own JVC X-1,mk2, then AT TK 7 CL and ADC 26. All those 4 are my best MM carts. |
@chakster , Curious sense for humor or teasing. I can also imagine something or other but not why whomever would be interested in the last time I listened to some of my (40) MM kinds? From my ''confession'' that I prefer MC kinds one can't deduce that I don't listen to MM kinds. There is something wrong with your logic. The reason is that Russian believe in Hegel's logic. He wrote two books about logic with more than 1000 pages but there is no one single sentence relevant for modern logic since Frege. |
I’m glad you’re back @nandric Look, accoring to the spanish speaking in this thread: The best MM/MI cartridge is with out doubt the AKG P100LE followed by Astatic MF-2500 and others as the JVC X1MK2 or the Technics EPC 100CMK4 but no one of them can even the quality performance levels of the ADC 26. The ADC is in a different league " the major league ". and for this reason he decided to sell his "ADC 26 BEST CARTRIDGE EVER? " (he wrote it with caps-lock as usual). Can you imagine? I saw his post where he's selling that "best ever" ADC How would you comment the logic behind this decision ? Just curious :) I would beliebe more if your statement about ADC and your 40 MM and a dosen on LOMC cartridges will be the same. Also i think you would play all the record only with ADC 26 (not with Ikeda) if the quality of this cartridge is so high compared to others. Right ? |
Dear chakster, ''Welcome back?'' If you mean to the ''old MM thread time'' yes. The time when we earned money with our carts obsession provided we were very vast and, of course, thanks to Raul. That is btw why I still own 40 of those kinds. I discovered by accidence the ADC 26 in one of my (many) ''parts boxes''. I directly imagined , say, $1000 price. But your practical logic is to praise the AT 170/180 of which you own an whole collection and criticize ADC 26 for obvious reasons. Well as is usual among brothers you get my advice for free. When you sell all your AT's you my ''accumulate'' sufficient capital to buy Ikeda 9 REX. The real ''best ever cart'' of all kinds (grin). |
@nandric I have tried my TRX. It is a TRX 2 with TRX 1 stylus. Bought it like it is. It is a very good performer. Nice sound, good stage, very wide but not extremly deep. Good highs and bass. Very good card. Compered to the ADC 25 it is also nice but not that "flowing". In my system the ADC 25 is very natural. Voices sound incredible, nearly like real. The 25 is more balanced and natural. The highs are not that bright, but also good. Bass is deep and tight and the mids are very natural too. This is only a first and fast opinion. Cheers |
@adc-grace, I am 100% sure about my first ADC 25. In the 70is it was one of the most expensive carts. To be precise 250 Dutch Gulden (= DM). So chakster ''estimation'' or qualification as ''cheap cart'' is not correct. My scholarship back then was 200 Gulden. So considering inflation the cart should be above 1000 euro at present. Alas I forget how ADC 25 sounded but my ADC 26 is anyway equal to TRX, II Berillium, JVC X-1,mk2 and AT TK 7 CL. |
@nandric The ADC is only the complete Kit. Means ADC cart and 3 differnet Styli. 2 elliptical and on conical. The ADC 26 or 27 are the versions with only one styli. I don´t know the JVC and the TK7, but with the TRX it will be on par. Buit the sound is different more relaxed and natural. As you say it was no cheap cartridge not in the 60s, not in the 70s or 80s. It was not the peak priced one but quite expensive for this time. I am sure, the ADC 25 would profit from a "modern" diamond shape like MicroRidge, lineContact or similar on a light sapphire cantilever. To my experience the most important thing is a really light tonearm. (works even on SL1210, but it is a compromise). At the moment I choose between the Grace F9 with diff. styli and ADC 25. Depends a little bit on the kind of music and quality of the Vinyl pressing. As Raul says "Enjoy the music" M. |
@nandric The price for ADC 26 was 22 000 YEN in Japan in the 70's: https://audio-heritage.jp/ADC/etc/adc-26.html and it's about the same as not even the best Victor X-1IIe 23 000 YEN at that time: https://audio-heritage.jp/VICTOR/etc/x-1iie.html But Victor X-1IIe has titanium cantilever and it's MM type with much better frequency response and "normal" compliance for any tonearm, price for Victor X-1IIe (for example) today is about $300-500 (used) and we have long statistics (sales history). At the same time the TRX-2 is widely popular with its exotic cantilevers and Vital Diamond Profile and today price is $300-700 max (depends on condition). So what's the reason for a 60's design of the cartridge with Aluminum cantilever and Elliptical tip to be more expensive than very popular models with exotic materials (the TRX designed by Nakatsuka San, now ZYX) ? There is no demand for ADC 26 and people who sold that cartridge normally asked very low price for it, because nobody needs it. Even in Netherlands (especially for you my friend), the cost is 175 euro nowadays, look here: https://www.marktplaats.nl/a/audio-tv-en-foto/platenspelers-en-pick-ups/m1375530213-orgineel-adc-26-stereo-element.html Of course, like our Maxican, enyone could ask crazy price for any cartridge and even create a special thread to sell it for astronomic price with promising title "the best ever?", but normally some smart buyers will look at the price statistic first. If there is no demand for a cartridge the price will never be as high as you suggested. The ADC 26 and related models in this series is extremely cheap in Tokyo, i've seen auction results and this is the reason i said it's a $100 cartridge today, well maybe NOS in the box could be $200-300. In the USA they must be even cheaper. So as i said, not bad for $100 cartridge. |
I don’t know for sure where ADC cartridges were manufactured, but I do recall back in the 70s that the ADC XLM and itS progenitors were much much cheaper in the US than in Europe. In fact at one point when I had to go to London for a scientific conference I brought ten ADC XLM cartridges with me and sold them to a dealer in London for a nice profit. Presumably he went on to resell them for an additional nice profit to his retail customers. So if the model 26 and its related cartridges was expensive in Europe back in the 60s, maybe it was much cheaper in the US. I have no recollection of that model from the old days. The first ADC cartridge that I knew about was the XLM series. Chakster , let’s be fair. Haven’t you also touted cartridges on this forum that you later went on to sell at high prices, largely supported by your own online endorsement? It’s perfectly OK with me for you to do that, but I’m just saying.I think Raul has more than one ADC 26, and perhaps feels he doesn’t need more than one. |
@lewm maybe you missed his post in another thread where he said he's taking serious offers on his "best ever" ADC, link to this "review" has been provided. I have nothing to add about his methodology of product placement. I can't remember i have ever started a thread or review just to sell any of my spares. Can't remember that someone like Nandric did the same or anyone else, did you? We can recommend nice carts when people ask for it. I can't say which cart "is the best ever." Each Raul's cart is the best ever in his opinion, but in his own world only. In my opinion if any cartridge cost a lot there is a reason for it, first reason in material used (cantilever, diamond profile, coil wire etc, cartridge body etc) and overall condition, rarity and market demand for it. There is also price statistics available for everyone. The ADC 26 is $200 cartridge with cheap body, average stylus and cantilever. Designed in the 60's before your XLM, long before my TRX-2, before any Sonus. The 60's isn't the best time for hi-fi cartridges, but the OP claimed it was the best Pritchard's design, so Pritchard has not been able even to upgrade his carts in the 70's, even with his Sonus brand after ADC? You are free to believe. |
Chakster, but who are you to declare what is the value of this or that cartridge or tonearm? No one single person can do that. Your opinion is just one of many and has no more stature than anyone else’s with any expertise. In fact I can recall one instance when it appeared superficially that you raved about a certain cartridge or tonearm and then went on to be a seller. No need to rehash that here. I have no problem with that. As I said. Raul has gone through several dozens of cartridges in his search for Nirvana. I think he does have two or 3 ADC 26s. So what’s the problem if he sells one? The value will be in the eye of the buyer. Evidently Raul is asking too much for the market to bear right now. And ultimately the market will determine what his cartridge it is worth. By the way, I will buy all the ADC 26s that you can find me for $200 each. Provided they are in mint or NOS condition. |
Dear @lewm : ADC were made it in USA as Sonus second Pritchard company too. The 26/27 outperforms " face to face " with all the same system to any Sonus models. Yes, you are rigth that I own more than one ADC 26 cartridge motor and original stylus and I owned for so many years that I not even remember of those great ADC models till I found out by " accident " looking for other cartridge in my closet. But here I posted to adc-grace ( I think ? ? ) that what I will do is what he said in his last post: to re-tip one of my stylus replacement for the best today stylus shape as could be Micro Ridge or something like that and I'm totally sure that as impressive as is the stock ADC 26/27 quality performance high levels it will be a " little " more impressive. Btw, the 26 and 27 stylus are the same but the 27 is nude version of the 26 stylus . Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R. |
@lewm Chakster, but who are you to declare what is the value of this or that cartridge or tonearm? I do not declare value myself, i just search statistics of sales in the internet and anyone can do that if a person know how to use internet. I have also published a valid japanese source with the actual price from the 60s and 70s for certain cartridges including ADS 26 before you have posted that you don't know when this cartridge was released. Do you read my posts? I have a bunch of rare cartridges because i search for them everyday anywhere in the world and i know the market value pretty well. Each of my post actually contains a useful links, maybe you never checked them and someone always complain to the moderator for some reason, asking to remove my post with links for ADS sales for very low price. Guess who was that person and why he did it? Also i believe the mention of the prices on the public forum can only HELP users not to be ripped-off. If you need ADC 26 just buy from Raul, i think you have no problem with that. The one for 175 Euro (ADC 26 in the box) from Netherlands here you have just missed, sorry. See how fast my post will be removed with no reason . |
@rauliruegas Yesterday I did a little try. Had a look on one of my ADC 25 styli and a Sonus Gold Styli (Pathemax diamond). So I changed the ADC cantilever with the Sonus cantilever. It fits. Perhaps not perfect, but enough to get an impression how the ADC works with a sharper diamond. What should I say? Yes it is better than the original diamond. So I will do the same as Raul. Try to get a modern diamond from a good retip service. About the thoughts of some here. The ADC 25 couldn´t be that good etc.... This is no expensive cartridge. If you own a lightweight tonearm just try it! You will be impressed for sure. But I also understand you. Couldn´t believe it too a few years ago. Tried it, but only on an Technics SL1210. It was good, but the tonearm didn´t match the cartridge. Now on the light tonearm it is just wonderful. Cheers |
I totally agree with my brother chakster that the primary function of our forum is exchange of information. I am also(?) multi- lingual and able to follow many international sites. One of the ''richest'' is the German ''audio-markt.de''. The most cartridge offerings are MC kinds (10 pages). The MM kinds are much more ''modest'' but I have just seen offering of ADC 25 styli for 199 euro. The plural means all 3. I understand confusion and different valuation of cart prices but my ''speculation'' is based on ''old MM thread'' . Each cart of the month sky rocketed in price after Raul's recommendation. I hope the same because I own this precious ADC 26. Something like saying: ''history repeat itself'' (grin). Sorry my brother (grin). |
@nandric
Good point, i think this is the reason why the OP promotes so high his cheap ADC in this thread while in another thread he post a comment that he acccept offers, comparing his cheap ADC to some very expensive LOMC. But it’s absurd because we are all knew that he prefer LOMC nowadays, not MM/MI like it was decades ago. A person who always contradict to himself: -Years ago he was fighting people for superiority of MM/MI over LOMC -Later the same person claimed it was a mistake and he has learned that LOMC are so much better. -And finally posted this review claiming the cheapest $200 MI ADC 25/27 is equal to his best of the best LOMC (and for this reason he’s selling this gem, his new discovery). Can you believe it ? I assume that he was right years ago about superiority of MI over MC, but why later he start posting in his own MM thread that LOMC are better ? Would anyone trust a reviewer who became a seller and selling products from his own review ? This tactic is so bizarre. Not sure who is his target audience here? P.S. Of cource we’re all have too many cartridges and we’re are all selling some of them from time to time, but the way we’re doing it is so different compared to a Mexican way. The prices for some vintage cartridge goes up because of the market demands and rarity. The review can rise up a demand, but can’t rise up the rarity. Also price statistic can not be deleted from the internet, no matter how much our Mexical can ask for his "gem" pretending not to be a seller. |
@adc-grace
Yesterday I did a little try. Had a look on one of my ADC 25 styli and a Sonus Gold Styli (Pathemax diamond). So I changed the ADC cantilever with the Sonus cantilever. It fits. Perhaps not perfect, but enough to get an impression how the ADC works with a sharper diamond. What should I say? Yes it is better than the original diamond. Sure, then why not to change the cantilever? So I will do the same as Raul. Try to get a modern diamond from a good retip service. It's optional, but if you agree that stylus does matter, i hope you agree that cantilever does matter too. Then summarise the cost of the High-End cantilever and High-End Stylus you're getting closer to the price of the completely different vintage cartridge with those types of cantilever and stylus already installed by original designer somewhere in the 80s. For example Grace products, if you will change just the stylus on your Grace you will upgrade the cartridge/sound. They made Boron/MicroRidge and Beryllium/MicroRidge, they are all high compliance. There is a HUGE difference between Aluminum/Elliptical and Boron/MicroRidge styli made by Grace (in my experience). So this brand's designers were smart enough to make many different styli (different cantilevers and diamonds) for their customers who would like to upgrade, so they don't need to retip or refurbish their carts with third-party vendors. Unfortunately ADC and its "genious" designer does not offer such option for his customers, no wonder why, because his ADC 26 was designed back in the 60s, when they can not even dream about Hi-Fi cartridges that appeared on the market only in the 70's and reached Ultra High-End quality only in the 80's. So the story about 60's ADC MI remind me a story about 60's Denon 103 MC. Owners are happy to invest more in their 60's cartridges instead of investing in the proper cartridges made with better styli/cantilevers a bit later in the 70's. There are many, but i'm not sure how many did you tried? The ADC 25 couldn´t be that good etc....This is no expensive cartridge. If you own a lightweight tonearm just try it! You will be impressed for sure.But I also understand you. Couldn´t believe it too a few years ago. Tried it, but only on an Technics SL1210. It was good, but the tonearm didn´t match the cartridge. Now on the light tonearm it is just wonderful. I;m surious what do you think about Denon DA-401 toneam for High-Compliance cartridges? Or Technics EPA-100 and EPA-100 mkII toneamrs for High Compliance cartridges ? Or Victor UA-7045 toneam? To my surprice some of the a'gon members are happy to use high Compliance MM even on Fidelity-Research FR64s high mass tonearm. I have the arm, but i haven't tried any MM on it yet. P.S. Where is ADC MI today ? But this is a brand new Coreless Straight-Flux Cartridge from ex Grace engineer, interesting one (for $12 000). |
@lewm it was J.Carr you has mentioned this new cartridge on our forum first, it was last year if i remember correct. Being a Grace fan i’m pround the ex Grace engineer invented this brand new cartridge. The name is TOP WING and they made two models, this is another model TOP WING Suzaku (Red Sparrow)
http://topwing.jp/RedSparrow-en.html
|
@chakster I changed the diamond including cantilever, sorry if I described not in the right way. For sure the stylus shape was fine and modern in the 60s. But even if I get another cantilever with a "state of the art" stylusshape it will be much cheaper the a Grace or something else (I bought my ADC a few years ago for about 50 €). I all ready own 3 F-9s. In my opinion the generator is very good (but heavy). I hope the ADC would benefit a lot. You are right. It is a little bit of a shame ADC and Sonus didn´t go the Grace route with a lot of different stylus. Not only as upgrade but also as a perfect match to your own listening routine. But it is like it is. I am sorry, I know these tonearms but never tried them myself. The ADC was good on the 1210, but is much better with the right tonearm match. At the moment I don´t know where the prices are. Haven´t seen one or a longer time. But I am sure you could find a bargain. Think the ADC 25 was produce in not too low numbers. These new "Grace" artridges look nice, but they are way out of my budget. @stringreen the failing of suspension is a common problem with the later ADC. Not with every stylus but can happen. I also had an XLM and ZLM (also very nice for vocal jazz etc.) with the same prob. Other XLMs and ZLMs I own don´t have the prob. |
Halcro, with regard to your message to Chakster I think I read that Chakster uses a Reed 3P tonearm, 12 inches in length, made of Cocobolo. He has apparently mounted more than one high compliance cartridge on that tonearm which would have an effective mass at least equal to that of an FR 64S, or maybe even an FR 66S. So de facto he has done the experiment. |
Dear @lewm : Certainly you have a misunderstood on the FR64S/Reed effective mass because are way different by a wide margin: Reed depending the wood/headshell models goes maximum at around 26 and normally around 22grs. where the 64S has 35grs. Here what Fleib posted in the MM thread: """ fleib VE has FR64S listed as 35g eff mass. I've heard the arm sound great with some moderate cu carts, but I wonder about high cu. It could be no change using a high quality arm 1/5 the mass, but I suspect otherwise. Eff mass is the same as MOI (moment of inertia) and even with low bearing friction the mass seems to slow down response and make it sound different. What might be authoritative with one cart might sound thick with another? I think Raul was right concerning low frequency resonance, but that's not the only consideration. Peter Pritchard advocated 6.5Hz. Maybe this was for his 50cu carts, but the Sonus arm has 4.1g eff mass. MOI is extremely low. Hard to imagine how extreme mass wouldn't make a difference. "" of course it makes a difference and not for the better. That we like it does not means: " for the better." Mr. Ikeda designed his FR64/66 tonearms thinking in his low cu and heavy LOMC cartridges he designed and never had in mind been coupled with 30 cu to 50 cu. Again, can work: so what?. I tested several MMs with my SAEC 506 very high effective mass: only its headshell weigth is 18grs. and is a long tonearm as the 66: go figure, and with not dry grease at SAEC bearings as FRs. Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R. |
@lewm Chakster uses a Reed 3P tonearm, 12 inches in length, made of Cocobolo. He has apparently mounted more than one high compliance cartridge on that tonearm which would have an effective mass at least equal to that of an FR 64S, or maybe even an FR 66S. So de facto he has done the experiment. At the moment i have 4 arms on my 2 turntables in the main system: FR-64fx with FR-7fz LOMC Victor UA-7082 (long) with Sony XL-55 MM SONY PUA-7 with Ortofon MC-2000 LOMC Lustre GST-801 Silver Wire has been tested with FR PMC-3 LOMC and now free of cartridge, will add my Piconeer PC-1000 mkII back soon. Normally Lustre and Victor are the arms where i can use MM/MI Waiting my audition: FR-64s with B-60 base (where i’m gonna use my Miyabi MCA) Denon DA-401 for all my High-compliance MM like Grace Technics EPA-100 which i’ve bought again last month (also for MM) Something that i can’t use on my Luxman PD-444: Technics EPA-100 mkII (must be on Victor TT-101 if i will fix that TT) Something that i have not used on Luxman PD-444 yet: Reed 3P "12 Cocobolo (it was my reference on Technics SP-10mkII) and it was fantastic with Glanz 61, Victor X-1II, Stanton 980 etc, AT-ML180 etc. BUT the effective mass of reed is 18g (without cartridge mass and screws). |
Dear @wolfie62 : The 10E as the 220 and 26 shares same kind of design including cartridge body shape but are not the same. At specs level the 10E is better than the 220 and the 26 best specs than the 10E. The review here is the 26 with the 27 stylus that's the nude elliptical one. As a fact the 10E came out/ was marketed just before the 26 that in theory is an improvement on the 10E. I can't speak on the 10E because I never listened to it, so for me the best down there is the 26/27. Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R. |
Just want to share with you a couple needle drops of my youtube channel of the ADC26-27 which i got from Raul a few months ago. https://youtu.be/2R6IWvjVWIk https://youtu.be/P933hdDtbQU Hope you like them and forgive my audio video amateur skills. This were done directly from the phono preamp to a Tascam sd20m (not from the speakers to avoid the room acoustics interaction) recorder and then uploaded through the imovie app on my phone. |
@nandric Yes I think is the way to go the 27 stylus is already around 35or 40 cu, probably the 25 is around 50cu, very high. What i would probably do when this stylus wears out is just send it to a rettiper and have him put something better like microline, the 27 is just nude elliptical with aluminum cantilever. Finding 26 or 27 replacements i,m sure won,t be easy. |
Cardani, As J. Carr explained the advantage of an aluminum cantilever is that the stylus can be pressure fitted in. To retip my 26 would mean gluing an stylus instead. This is done by cutting the existing cantilever and than gluing the new one on the restant of the old cantilever. I have done this once but never again. Besides the suspension is very difficult to fix on those ADC's . I have seen new 25 for $100 but will try to get an 26 or 27. |
Dear @cardani : Thank’s to share your playback videos and good to know that everything is ok with because I remember the " problems " when you began its set up. Not an easy cartridge for set up and I mean a set up where the cartridge can shows at its best. For other Agoner’s cardani is a gentleman that lives in my country México but in a different city that where I live. He and his wife are double-bass active players in the Xalapa Symphonic Orchestra so first than all he is a MUSIC lover that like to enjoy MUSIC in his home. He knew and listened the 26 at my place in one of his trips to México city and due that I owned two26/27 samples with in good condition stylus I sold to him one of those samples. Btw, before you bougth the 26/27 my idea was to send one sample to a re-tipper looking not only for a today stylus shape but boron cantilever and I still think about with the sample I own due to its great quality performance an extraordinary cartridge motor: unique for say the least. VdH can do for me. I listened to my over 100 cartridges but always come back to the 26/27 unit. It’s the only MM/MI cartridge that really does not performs or has the sound signature of MM/MI cartridges, it’s a lot more in the LOMC top models side. For me even today still is a fenomenal discovery and came from the early 60’s. Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R. |