jhills,
Fascinating.
My impressions of the Raidho monitors vs the Gershman speakers I've heard was precisely the reverse of yours.
The Raidho sound actually has a reputation for not being in the "strictly accurate/neutral" school of design. They deliberately depart from flat and are more designed by and for the ear, and have a dip in the upper midrange giving them a smooth, middle or further hall sound, though highly resolved.
That's exactly what I heard when I auditioned them. Unfortunately I found the frequency scoop a bit too obvious and all sorts of transient information I new well (e.g. cymbals, guitars etc in certain tracks) were reduced in vibrancy and presence.
On the other hand I find the Gershman sound to be competent, but more in the "fatiguing after a while" category.
Go figure!
Fascinating.
My impressions of the Raidho monitors vs the Gershman speakers I've heard was precisely the reverse of yours.
The Raidho sound actually has a reputation for not being in the "strictly accurate/neutral" school of design. They deliberately depart from flat and are more designed by and for the ear, and have a dip in the upper midrange giving them a smooth, middle or further hall sound, though highly resolved.
That's exactly what I heard when I auditioned them. Unfortunately I found the frequency scoop a bit too obvious and all sorts of transient information I new well (e.g. cymbals, guitars etc in certain tracks) were reduced in vibrancy and presence.
On the other hand I find the Gershman sound to be competent, but more in the "fatiguing after a while" category.
Go figure!